Income Tax News

State

AlabamaAlaskaArizonaArkansasCaliforniaColoradoConnecticutDelawareFloridaGeorgiaHawaiiIdahoIllinoisIndianaIowaKansasKentuckyLouisianaMaineMarylandMassachusettsMichiganMinnesotaMississippiMissouriMontanaNebraskaNevadaNew HampshireNew JerseyNew MexicoNew YorkNorth CarolinaNorth DakotaOhioOklahomaOregonPennsylvaniaRhode IslandSouth CarolinaSouth DakotaTennesseeTexasUtahVermontVirginiaWashingtonWashington D.C.West VirginiaWisconsinWyomingPuerto RicoUS Virgin IslandsArmed Forces AmericasArmed Forces PacificArmed Forces EuropeNorthern Mariana IslandsMarshall IslandsAmerican SamoaFederated States of MicronesiaGuamPalauAlberta, CanadaBritish Columbia, CanadaManitoba, CanadaNew Brunswick, CanadaNewfoundland, CanadaNova Scotia, CanadaNorthwest Territories, CanadaNunavut, CanadaOntario, CanadaPrince Edward Island, CanadaQuebec, CanadaSaskatchewan, CanadaYukon Territory, Canada

Zip Code

Country

United States of AmericaUS Virgin IslandsUnited States Minor Outlying IslandsCanadaMexico, United Mexican StatesBahamas, Commonwealth of theCuba, Republic ofDominican RepublicHaiti, Republic ofJamaicaAfghanistanAlbania, People’s Socialist Republic ofAlgeria, People’s Democratic Republic ofAmerican SamoaAndorra, Principality ofAngola, Republic ofAnguillaAntarctica (the territory South of 60 deg S)Antigua and BarbudaArgentina, Argentine RepublicArmeniaArubaAustralia, Commonwealth ofAustria, Republic ofAzerbaijan, Republic ofBahrain, Kingdom ofBangladesh, People’s Republic ofBarbadosBelarusBelgium, Kingdom ofBelizeBenin, People’s Republic ofBermudaBhutan, Kingdom ofBolivia, Republic ofBosnia and HerzegovinaBotswana, Republic ofBouvet Island (Bouvetoya)Brazil, Federative Republic ofBritish Indian Ocean Territory (Chagos Archipelago)British Virgin IslandsBrunei DarussalamBulgaria, People’s Republic ofBurkina FasoBurundi, Republic ofCambodia, Kingdom ofCameroon, United Republic ofCape Verde, Republic ofCayman IslandsCentral African RepublicChad, Republic ofChile, Republic ofChina, People’s Republic ofChristmas IslandCocos (Keeling) IslandsColombia, Republic ofComoros, Union of theCongo, Democratic Republic ofCongo, People’s Republic ofCook IslandsCosta Rica, Republic ofCote D’Ivoire, Ivory Coast, Republic of theCyprus, Republic ofCzech RepublicDenmark, Kingdom ofDjibouti, Republic ofDominica, Commonwealth ofEcuador, Republic ofEgypt, Arab Republic ofEl Salvador, Republic ofEquatorial Guinea, Republic ofEritreaEstoniaEthiopiaFaeroe IslandsFalkland Islands (Malvinas)Fiji, Republic of the Fiji IslandsFinland, Republic ofFrance, French RepublicFrench GuianaFrench PolynesiaFrench Southern TerritoriesGabon, Gabonese RepublicGambia, Republic of theGeorgiaGermanyGhana, Republic ofGibraltarGreece, Hellenic RepublicGreenlandGrenadaGuadaloupeGuamGuatemala, Republic ofGuinea, Revolutionary
People’s Rep’c ofGuinea-Bissau, Republic ofGuyana, Republic ofHeard and McDonald IslandsHoly See (Vatican City State)Honduras, Republic ofHong Kong, Special Administrative Region of ChinaHrvatska (Croatia)Hungary, Hungarian People’s RepublicIceland, Republic ofIndia, Republic ofIndonesia, Republic ofIran, Islamic Republic ofIraq, Republic ofIrelandIsrael, State ofItaly, Italian RepublicJapanJordan, Hashemite Kingdom ofKazakhstan, Republic ofKenya, Republic ofKiribati, Republic ofKorea, Democratic People’s Republic ofKorea, Republic ofKuwait, State ofKyrgyz RepublicLao People’s Democratic RepublicLatviaLebanon, Lebanese RepublicLesotho, Kingdom ofLiberia, Republic ofLibyan Arab JamahiriyaLiechtenstein, Principality ofLithuaniaLuxembourg, Grand Duchy ofMacao, Special Administrative Region of ChinaMacedonia, the former Yugoslav Republic ofMadagascar, Republic ofMalawi, Republic ofMalaysiaMaldives, Republic ofMali, Republic ofMalta, Republic ofMarshall IslandsMartiniqueMauritania, Islamic Republic ofMauritiusMayotteMicronesia, Federated States ofMoldova, Republic ofMonaco, Principality ofMongolia, Mongolian People’s RepublicMontserratMorocco, Kingdom ofMozambique, People’s Republic ofMyanmarNamibiaNauru, Republic ofNepal, Kingdom ofNetherlands AntillesNetherlands, Kingdom of theNew CaledoniaNew ZealandNicaragua, Republic ofNiger, Republic of theNigeria, Federal Republic ofNiue, Republic ofNorfolk IslandNorthern Mariana IslandsNorway, Kingdom ofOman, Sultanate ofPakistan, Islamic Republic ofPalauPalestinian Territory, OccupiedPanama, Republic ofPapua New GuineaParaguay, Republic ofPeru, Republic ofPhilippines, Republic of thePitcairn IslandPoland, Polish People’s RepublicPortugal, Portuguese RepublicPuerto RicoQatar, State ofReunionRomania, Socialist Republic ofRussian FederationRwanda, Rwandese RepublicSamoa, Independent State ofSan Marino, Republic ofSao Tome and Principe, Democratic Republic ofSaudi Arabia, Kingdom ofSenegal, Republic ofSerbia and MontenegroSeychelles, Republic ofSierra Leone, Republic ofSingapore, Republic ofSlovakia (Slovak Republic)SloveniaSolomon IslandsSomalia, Somali RepublicSouth Africa, Republic ofSouth Georgia and the South Sandwich IslandsSpain, Spanish StateSri Lanka, Democratic Socialist Republic ofSt. HelenaSt. Kitts and NevisSt. LuciaSt. Pierre and MiquelonSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudan, Democratic Republic of theSuriname, Republic ofSvalbard & Jan Mayen IslandsSwaziland, Kingdom ofSweden, Kingdom ofSwitzerland, Swiss ConfederationSyrian Arab RepublicTaiwan, Province of ChinaTajikistanTanzania, United Republic ofThailand, Kingdom ofTimor-Leste, Democratic Republic ofTogo, Togolese RepublicTokelau (Tokelau Islands)Tonga, Kingdom ofTrinidad and Tobago, Republic ofTunisia, Republic ofTurkey, Republic ofTurkmenistanTurks and Caicos IslandsTuvaluUganda, Republic ofUkraineUnited Arab EmiratesUnited Kingdom of Great Britain & N. IrelandUruguay, Eastern Republic ofUzbekistanVanuatuVenezuela, Bolivarian Republic ofViet Nam, Socialist Republic ofWallis and Futuna IslandsWestern SaharaYemenZambia, Republic ofZimbabwe

Originally Appeared Here

The check’s not in the mail.

Tax filers who opted to get their IRS refunds sent to their homes said their checks never arrived and were allegedly stolen as part of a massive fraud costing millions of dollars, according to a report.

More than 200 taxpayers who were expecting refund checks ranging from a few hundred dollars to as much as $500,000 have complained to Rep. Nicole Malliotakis (R-NY) that they were victims of theft, the Wall Street Journal reported.

Some tax filers who opted to receive their IRS refunds in the mail never received the checks. Christopher Sadowski

Malliotakis, who represents Staten Island, said the 218 cases that her office has fielded include checks totaling $3.8 million.

One of her constituents had to reissue their request to the IRS four times before receiving a refund check.

“People are getting these checks reissued and the reissued checks are stolen,” Malliotakis told the Journal.

Bennett Grimm, a spine surgeon based in Atlanta, told the Journal that he was notified by the IRS in February that he should expect to receive a refund check from his 2021 amended tax return in two to three weeks’ time.

Grimm said he was expecting a check for $96,000, which the IRS owed him after he sold his medical practice.

But by May, the check hadn’t arrived.

When his account requested a new check, it was stolen and deposited fraudulently, according to the Journal.

Grimm said he is now awaiting his third refund check.

More than 200 taxpayers have complained to Rep. Nicole Malliotakis about stolen refund checks. AP

More than 90% of taxpayers choose to get their refunds through direct deposit, which requires giving the IRS bank account information.

But an estimated 10 million filers opt to receive paper checks — making them a target for theft.

Those who receive paper checks can’t switch to direct deposit for that tax year in case of lost or stolen funds.

“We strongly urge direct deposit,” IRS Commissioner Danny Werfel told the Journal.

Start your day with the latest business news right at your fingertips

Subscribe to our daily Business Report newsletter!

Thanks for signing up!

“It’s the fastest and safest way for us to get taxpayers their refunds.” 

Tax filers who had their refund checks lost or stolen are encouraged to fill out an IRS taxpayer statement form and mail or fax it to the IRS office where the return was filed.

Once the Treasury Department’s Bureau of Fiscal Service determines that the claim is legitimate, it will send a new check.

The process can take up to four months, though in some cases it can take less than 30 days.

The IRS encourages taxpayers to opt for direct deposit rather than paper checks. Christopher Sadowski

Last year, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network issued an alert on a nationwide rise in theft-related check fraud.

In February, two New York residents were sent to federal prison for stealing a $2.9 million IRS refund check that was bound for a Houston couple.

In August, a Los Angeles man was sentenced to more than seven years in prison for using Instagram to solicit bank account holders to deposit stolen checks worth at least $2.7 million.

The IRS said it is modernizing its core technology to include more functions that will enable taxpayers to log into their accounts online.

“As we modernize, we have to do it thoughtfully with a lot of due diligence,” Werfel told the Journal.

Originally Appeared Here

4 min read Last Updated : Oct 02 2024 | 8:10 PM IST

The Ministry of Finance has released new guidelines for handling delayed tax refund claims and loss carry forward applications. The new guidelines issued on Tuesday increase the limit of tax refund claim amount in condonation of delay cases which will help taxpayers who missed filing any ITR though had a tax refund due to him/her.

“…the present circular is being issued to deal with the applications for condonation of delay in filing returns claiming refund and returns claiming carry forward of loss and set off thereof containing comprehensive guidelines on the conditions for condonation and the procedures to the followed for deciding such matters,” said Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) under Ministry of Finance in a circular.
 

Click here to connect with us on WhatsApp

 

“This enhancement in jurisdiction limits will significantly streamline the condonation of delay process for tax refunds, allowing taxpayers to receive their refunds faster and with reduced bureaucratic hurdles, especially for higher-value claims. It fosters trust and improves the ease of compliance for taxpayers,” said Amit Bansal, Partner, Singhania & Co.

 

Key points:

 

Tiered authority structure: The circular establishes a three-tier system for processing applications based on claim amounts:

 

Claim amount: Less than or equal to Rs 1 crore

 

– The Principal Commissioners of Income-tax/Commissioners of Income-tax (Pr. CsIT/CsIT) will have the authority to either accept or reject applications if the claimed amount is less than or equal to Rs 1 crore for an assessment year.

 

Claim amount: Between Rs 1- 3 crore

 

The Chief Commissioners of Income-tax (CCsIT) will have the authority to either accept or reject applications if the claimed amount is Rs 1 crore but is not more than Rs 3 crore.

 

Claim amount: Above Rs 3 crore

 

The Principal Chief Commissioners of Income-tax (Pr. CCsIT) will have the authority to either accept or reject applications if the claimed amount is above Rs 3 crore.

 

Time limit: A strict five-year limit from the end of the assessment year has been imposed for filing condonation applications. This rule applies to all applications filed on or after October 1, 2024.

 

Processing time: Authorities are directed to dispose of applications within six months of receipt.

 

Court-related claims: For refund claims arising from court orders, the period of court proceedings will be excluded from the five-year limit. Applications must be filed within six months of the court order or the end of the financial year, whichever is later.

 

Supplementary claims: A belated application for supplementary claim of refund (claim of additional amount of refund after completion of assessment for the same year) can be admitted for condonation provided other conditions as referred above are fulfilled. The powers of acceptance/rejection within the monetary limits delegated to the Pr.CCsIT/CCsIT/Pr.CsIT/CsIT in case of returns claiming refund and supplementary claim of refund would be subject to the following further conditions;

 

i. The income of the assessee is not accessible in the hands of any other person under any of the provisions of the Act.

 

ii. No interest will be admissible on a belated claim of refunds.

 

iii. The refund has arisen as a result of excess tax deducted/collected at source and/or excess advance tax payment and/or excess payment of self-assessment tax as per the provisions of the Act.

 

No interest on belated claims: The circular specifies that no interest will be admissible on belated refund claims.

 

Verification extension: It is also provided that the Commissioner of Income-tax, Central Processing Centre (CPC), Bengaluru can accept or reject the petitions under section 119(2)(b) of the Act seeking condonation of delay in verifying the return of income by sending the ITR-V to centralised processing cell (CPC), Bengaluru within the prescribed time limit.

 

The new guidelines aim to streamline the process of handling delayed tax refund claims and loss carry forward applications, providing clarity to both taxpayers and tax authorities.

First Published: Oct 02 2024 | 8:10 PM IST

Originally Appeared Here

$300 IRS CTC Payment In Oct 2024: The monthly payments related to the Child Tax Credit (CTC) are expected to be a major source of financial benefit to the targeted families. The children below the age of six years will be entitled to $300 per month or $3,600 per year. The children of six to seventeen years of age will be paid $250 per month or $3,000 per year. It is therefore very crucial to meet the $300 IRS CTC Payment Eligibility Criteria. 

According to reliable information, the expected payout date may be October 15, 2024, but this is not definite. For more details about the $300 IRS CTC Direct Deposit October 2024 and to know the chances of getting IRS CTC Payment, please read the full article. Also, refer to the $300 IRS CTC Payment In October 2024. Unfortunately, we are not able to verify this payment at the moment since our research did not produce any results related to it. 

$300 IRS CTC Payment 2024

Unlike the one-time tax rebate, the Child Tax Credit for 2024 is to be paid on a monthly basis, which will help families sustain their financial needs. It will be made on the fifteenth of each month. 

To know if you are qualified for the $300 IRS CTC Payment 2024 In October, please read the entire article and get to know more about the $300 CTC that is expected to be released in Oct, 2024. 

Further examination is encouraged. This payment will be examined and no relevant information has been provided to support it, therefore we cannot verify the accuracy of this payment. 

$300 IRS CTC Payment 2024 Dates

The timetable for the $300 IRS CTC Payment 2024 is mentioned below.

Month	$300 IRS CTC Payment 2024 Dates	Days
July	15th July 2024	Monday
August	13th August 2024	Tuesday
September	15th September 2024	Friday
October	15th October 2024	Tuesday
November	15th November 2024	Friday
December	15th December 2024	Sunday

SBI SO Recruitment 2024: आवेदन शुरू @sbi.co.in, 4 अक्टूबर तक करें पंजीकरण, चयन प्रक्रिया शॉर्टलिस्टिंग और इंटरव्यू

Army MES Recruitment 2024 Apply Online, Group C 41822+ Posts, Check Dates, Eligibility, Fee, Exam & Selection

SSC Constable Registration 2025 आवेदन प्रक्रिया शुरू [5 सितंबर से 14 अक्टूबर], 10वीं पास, Direct Apply लिंक

$300 IRS CTC Payment 2024 Eligibility

Families with the following criteria are eligible to receive the $300 IRS CTC Payment 2024 that will go out in Oct, 2024. The IRS has detailed the specifics:-

1. The child must be under 17 years of age at the end of 2024.
2. The child has to be a U.S. citizen, U.S. national, or U.S. resident alien
3. Income Requirements: In the case of joint fliers, $150,000 or less, Here to $112,500 for heads of households, Single filer earning $75,000 or less.
4. Families must have filed their 2023 tax returns to meet the new qualification.
5. The taxpayer had to live with the child for at least six months during 2024.
6. The IRS online portal will need to be updated for any important events like a new child or changes in income.

Claim IRS $300 CTC Payment In October 2024

Steps to Apply for $300 CTC Payment In October 2024 For claimants who fulfill the requirements see below.

• Firstly, go to the official website of the company at www.irs.gov to fill the online application form.

• Make sure that you type your details correctly as soon as you get a chance to access the form. 
• If necessary, upload scanned copies of the appropriate documents using the form provided at the link above. 
• Review the form in its entirety before you submit it. 
• After filling the form, please, send it and wait for the staff to go through your application. 

Some Facts about $300 IRS CTC Payment 2024

• The $300 IRS CTC Payment is part of monthly advance payments for the 2024 Child Tax Credit. 
• The income limit for joint filing is $150,000 and for single filing it is $75,000. 
• The majority of the families will get their CTC payments through direct deposit while others through paper checks. 
• The annual CTC amounts are $2,300 for children below the age of 6 years and $2,000 for children within the age of 6-17 years.

$700 + $1000 + $300 CRA Triple Payments September 2024: Check the Eligibility, Deposit Dates & Claim Process

RRB Group D Recruitment 2024 Notification [1 Lakh Posts]: Eligibility 10th Pass, Fee, Apply Online @www.rrcb.gov.in

UP Police Constable Result 2024: Download Link Available Soon, Check Cut Off Marks

Conclusion :-

The $300 IRS CTC Payment In October 2024 is a great help for families who are raising children. The Child Tax Credit is very important in alleviating child poverty and in assisting families to cope with inflationary effects through increased credit amounts and regular monthly payments. 

In this way, families will be able to know the eligibility criteria, payment dates as well as how to claim the IRS CTC Payment in October, 2024. 

FAQ’s: IRS $300 CTC Payment 2024

Which families will receive the IRS $300 CTC Payment In Oct, 2024? 

Households with children under 17 years and with an annual income of less than $150,000 for married people filing jointly or $75,000 for single filers are eligible. 

What am I going to get for the $300 CTC payment? 

In case you have provided the IRS with direct deposit information, the payment will be deposited in your account. If not, then you will receive a check in the mail. 

What is the payment date for CTC in October 2024? 

As for the exact dates, they still remain rather vague, but the payment is estimated to be made no later than October 15, 2024. 

What should I do if there is a change in my family income or number of dependents? 

In order to qualify for the CTC payment, you have to update your information through the IRS online portal. 

Where can applicants submit their application to work and earn IRS $300 CTC Payment? 

The official website of the company can be viewed at www.irs.gov, the candidates can apply for this payment plan and get the instructions. 

Originally Appeared Here

California budgeted $157 billion dollars this past fiscal year to provide health care for low-income residents. It provides that care through a program called Medi-Cal, which is funded by a combination of state and matching federal funds. The services covered serve about 15 million low-income Californians.

The program is an important safety net but as health-care costs balloon the state has sought to find other sources of funding besides general fund monies.

Since 2009, a Managed Care Organization Provider Tax has raised revenue off of the health-care management companies that provide the bulk of Medi-Cal services. The tax generates billions of dollars each year and increases the amount of federal matching funds that come to state coffers to pay for Medi-Cal. The tax has been approved by the state legislature repeatedly, and the current renewal expires in 2026.

Proposition 35 on the November ballot would make that tax permanent and create dedicated funding for some Medi-Cal services.

Official title on the ballot: Proposition 35: Provides Permanent Funding for Medi-Cal Health Care Services. Initiative Statute

You are being asked: Should California make permanent an existing tax on managed health care insurance plans and limit how that money is spent?

WHAT YOUR VOTE MEANS

• A “yes” vote means: A “yes” vote means you support making permanent a California tax on managed care organizations that would otherwise expire in 2026, and change some Medi-Cal funding allocations.

• A “no” vote means: A “no” vote would mean you oppose making the tax permanent and/or carrying out the funding changes.

Understanding Prop. 35

Medi-Cal is the name for California’s Medicaid program. It provides affordable health care for low-income people by reimbursing health care providers with a mix of state and federal funds.

Many hospitals serve indigent and low-income populations that can pay very little or nothing at all for the health care they receive. Hospitals must absorb those costs.

Make It Make Sense: Election 2024 Edition

Our election newsletter helps you make sense of the choices on your ballot and what the results mean for your life in SoCal. Starts again this fall.

The Managed Care Organization Provider tax exists to close that gap. Prop. 35 would continue the tax but also direct more money from that tax specifically into Medi-Cal, which means more money for providers and less money for the state’s general fund.

“You’re using that tax to draw down federal dollars that will increase the budget, allow you to pay the plans higher premiums to take care of the Medi-Cal population, and then those plans are supposed to take those premiums and pay better reimbursement, down to the providers and their network,” and that improves health care for low-income residents, said Dr. Dylan Roby, professor of health, society, and behavior at UC Irvine.

The history behind it

Prop. 35 supporters say care for the most vulnerable state residents, such as low-income children and seniors, is underfunded.

The costs of medical services are increasing while California has recently expanded who is eligible to use Medi-Cal. Higher unemployment has led to more people enrolling in Medi-Cal services. This kind of situation was seen during the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic.

There is no co-pay, premium, or out-of-pocket expense for people who qualify for and sign up for Medi-Cal.

Prop. 35 would increase funding for services like behavioral health facilities, outpatient facilities, and some hospital services.

How it would work

The tax is set to expire in 2026. Prop. 35 would make the tax permanent and dedicate more money from that tax to Medi-Cal. It would also include a four-year temporary increase to the state limit of health spending by the size of the health plan tax.

If Prop. 35 fails in the November election, California legislators and the Governor would have to go through the political process of seeking the tax’s renewal after it expires. People who spoke to LAist for this guide said they believe lawmakers would find a way to renew the tax.

What people who support it say

The measure’s supporters argue that the high cost of publicly funded health care reimbursement for low-income people leads the state to spend a lot of money to fill the gap not covered by federal funds.

“This is not a quick fix problem,” said Tony Sinay, professor of public health at California State University, Los Angeles.

Prop. 35 supporters say the measure’s changes would improve health care for low-income residents.

“Voters should know this is a generational opportunity to really invest in our Medicaid system in California that will ensure better access to patients across California,” said Jodi Hicks, president and CEO of Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California and co-chair of the Yes on 35 campaign.

Prop. 35 supporters say it’s also OK to create dedicated funding streams because health care should be a long-term public priority.

“This funding mechanism is always supposed to be put back into health care. So these are health-care dollars. That should be spent in health care,” said Prop. 35 supporter Hicks.

There’s a long list of supporters. The California Medical Association, California Hospital Association, California Academy of Family Physicians are among the measure’s backers.

What people who oppose it say

As of publication, there has been no spending in opposition to Prop. 35. But there are detractors.

“I certainly think our healthcare system has problems in California, and there are areas for improvement, but I don’t necessarily think that Prop. 35 addresses those problems,” UC Irvine’s Roby said.

Prop. 35 is another example of ballot box budgeting, he said — a term to describe a state measure that locks up spending and takes flexibility away from legislators during the budget cycle. That’s Governor Gavin Newsom’s objection to Prop. 35, as well.

Anti-tax activists are also against Prop. 35.

“Everyone likes health-care services,” said Carl DeMaio, the conservative activist and State Assembly candidate, via his YouTube platform.

“It’s a bait-and-switch type tax increase … you’re going to have to pay more in federal taxes,” he predicted.

Potential financial impact

A federal tax hike is not predicted by the Legislative Analyst’s office.

There are costs. The independent analysis by the Legislative Analyst’s Office expects Prop. 35 to raise about $4 billion more each year for Medi-Cal, about half of that coming from Prop. 35 and the other half from federal funds. The Legislative Analyst also says there are short-term costs to the state of $1 billion to $2 billion in each of the years 2025 and 2026.

Follow the money

Stay tuned. We will update this story with campaign finance information as we get closer to the election.

Listen in: AirTalk takes on Prop. 35

Here’s our recent AirTalk segment on Prop. 35. To advocate for the bill is Jodi Hicks, president and CEO of Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California, which is part of the “Yes on 35” coalition. To advocate against it is Kiran Savage-Sangwan, executive director of the California Pan-Ethnic Health Network, a statewide health advocacy organization that officially opposes Prop 35.

Prop 35: Should we make permanent a tax on managed care health insurance plans?

Before you read more, we wanted to take a moment to tell you about our mission here at LAist, and why we’re so dedicated to helping you get ready to vote.

In the lead-up to this important election, our hard-working reporters and editors spent hundreds and hundreds of hours researching and writing these detailed guides and fact-based resources. We invested that time because we’re here to help you vote confidently and make your community a better place.

But we cannot do this essential work without your help. We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.

At a time when the need for local journalism has never been greater, many newsrooms are facing cutbacks, including LAist. Member support — your support — is what will sustain a free press in Southern California.

LAist’s mission is to be here for you, so please be here for us now with a donation to power our trusted local reporting. Step up right now and make the choice to give. Because that’s exactly what it is — a choice. It’s choice with consequences. If readers do not choose to step up and donate, the future of fact-based news in Southern California will not be as strong.

No matter what happens in the world, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust.

Thank you for your generous support.

Sincerely,

Chip in now to fund your local journalism

Continue

What questions do you have about the upcoming general election?

You ask, and we’ll answer: Whether it’s about how to interpret the results or track your ballot, we’re here to help you understand the 2024 general election on Nov. 5.

Ask a Question

Originally Appeared Here

17

The Internal Revenue Service is bigger and better than ever, with $80 billion in new funding and 80,000 new agents to scour through and scrutinize the tax returns of every day Americans.

Now, the union which represents the IRS employees is thanking Vice President Kamala Harris for her service and contribution in the form of an official endorsement.

In September 2024, the National Treasury Employees Union (NTEU) threw its support behind Vice President Kamala Harris for President of the United States. This endorsement, announced by NTEU President Doreen Greenwald, highlighted Harris’s consistent advocacy for federal employees and her commitment to workers’ rights throughout her career.

As the largest union representing IRS and other federal employees, the NTEU’s endorsement was largely driven by Harris’s role in advancing pro-labor policies during her time as Vice President, including spearheading the White House Task Force on Worker Organizing and Empowerment. This task force improved organizing efforts and expanded workers’ rights, especially within federal agencies like the IRS.

Greenwald praised Harris for her strong support of fair pay, family leave, and funding for federal agencies, specifically citing her role in rebuilding the IRS under the Inflation Reduction Act. She also noted Harris’s commitment to passing the 2024 bipartisan border bill and securing staffing for key agencies like Customs and Border Protection.

The NTEU’s endorsement was also extended to Harris’s running mate, Tim Walz, the Governor of Minnesota and a long-time labor advocate. Both Harris and Walz have strong records of supporting unions and advancing policies that aim to empower workers.

For the union, electing Harris and Walz represents a continuation of policies that ensure federal employees are respected and given the resources they need to effectively serve the public. This endorsement is a significant boost for Harris as she continues her campaign for the presidency.

• Ukrainian President Tours American War Complex Factory Making Artillery Shells in Pennsylvania

  SCRANTON, PA – This weekend, during a tour of the Scranton Army Ammunition Plant in Pennsylvania, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy expressed his gratitude for the artillery shells and other munitions being produced for Ukraine’s defense.

  The plant, which manufactures components for 155mm artillery and mortar shells, is playing a key role in supplying Ukraine with vital resources for its ongoing war against Russian aggression.

  

  Zelenskyy praised the dedication of the factory workers, stating that their hard work is helping Ukraine “stand strong” in its fight for freedom. In a message shared on social media, he thanked the people of Scranton and Americans across the country who are contributing billions of dollars to Ukraine’s defense efforts, calling the munitions they produce the ammunition being used on the battlefield overseas.

  This visit underscores the deepening military collaboration between the U.S. and Ukraine, as American taxpayer funding continues to support the production of critical weaponry aimed at reinforcing Ukraine’s fight for democracy and sovereignty.

• Teen Wounded in Overnight Shooting on Price Street

  PHILADELPHIA — A 19-year-old male was shot Monday night in the city’s 14th District, police said. The shooting occurred at 10:24 p.m. on the 1300 block of E Price Street.

  The victim was struck once in the right thigh and was taken to Albert Einstein Medical Center by private vehicle. He is currently listed in stable condition, according to authorities.

  No weapons were recovered at the scene, and no arrests have been made. Investigators are continuing to gather evidence as the scene remains held for further investigation.

  Police have not yet provided additional details regarding the incident.

• The IRS Endorses Kamala Harris for President, Thanks V.P. for All She Has Done

  The Internal Revenue Service is bigger and better than ever, with $80 billion in new funding and 80,000 new agents to scour through and scrutinize the tax returns of every day Americans.

  Now, the union which represents the IRS employees is thanking Vice President Kamala Harris for her service and contribution in the form of an official endorsement.

  In September 2024, the National Treasury Employees Union (NTEU) threw its support behind Vice President Kamala Harris for President of the United States. This endorsement, announced by NTEU President Doreen Greenwald, highlighted Harris’s consistent advocacy for federal employees and her commitment to workers’ rights throughout her career.

  This is funny 😂
  pic.twitter.com/FyEATwmprJ

  — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) September 22, 2024

  As the largest union representing IRS and other federal employees, the NTEU’s endorsement was largely driven by Harris’s role in advancing pro-labor policies during her time as Vice President, including spearheading the White House Task Force on Worker Organizing and Empowerment. This task force improved organizing efforts and expanded workers’ rights, especially within federal agencies like the IRS.

  Greenwald praised Harris for her strong support of fair pay, family leave, and funding for federal agencies, specifically citing her role in rebuilding the IRS under the Inflation Reduction Act. She also noted Harris’s commitment to passing the 2024 bipartisan border bill and securing staffing for key agencies like Customs and Border Protection.

  The NTEU’s endorsement was also extended to Harris’s running mate, Tim Walz, the Governor of Minnesota and a long-time labor advocate. Both Harris and Walz have strong records of supporting unions and advancing policies that aim to empower workers.

  For the union, electing Harris and Walz represents a continuation of policies that ensure federal employees are respected and given the resources they need to effectively serve the public. This endorsement is a significant boost for Harris as she continues her campaign for the presidency.

Originally Appeared Here

The recommendations were within the groups’ submissions to the Department of Finance’s 2025 pre-budget consultation, which closed last month.

“As a small business owner today, it’s hard to do anything without bringing in a tax lawyer and an accountant to confirm that what you’re doing will not create tax issues [down the line],” said Kevin Wark, tax advisor with CALU, in an interview.

For example, he said the benefits of the new family business transfer rules can be lost if the owner implements the complicated rules incorrectly.

The proposed hike in the CGIR to two-thirds from half became effective on June 25, but the change has yet to be passed into law, said John Oakey, vice-president of taxation for CPA Canada, in an interview.

“How do we plan for what we’re doing when we have no idea what’s actually going to happen?” Oakey said.

The proposed change also presents administrative challenges, Oakey said. For example, a corporation with a June 30 year end that realized a capital gain or loss on June 27, 2024, would have difficulty filing a tax return ahead of its six-month filing deadline if it chose to do so.

“The [tax fililng] software is not ready for it because the CRA is waiting for legislation [to update its forms],” Oakey said.

In July, the CRA told Investment Executive the 2024 version of Schedule 3: Capital Gains (and Losses), the form for individuals, is “still under development as we wait for final legislative details.” The form will be uploaded to the CRA website “by end of January 2025,” the agency said.

CPA Canada’s submission said a “number of significant and complex tax changes” were “adding to an already excessive regulatory and compliance burden on individuals, businesses and tax professionals.”

Said CPA’s Oakey: “The pace is the biggest issue we have — there is so much coming through so fast that the system can’t keep up.”

CALU called on the government to commission an expert panel to review the tax rules governing small businesses. The group argued that tax changes affecting small businesses introduced since 2018, including the expansion of the rules concerning the tax on split income and the introduction of passive investment rules to limit access to the small business deduction, have created “a disincentive to establishing and growing a small business in Canada.”

“There has been a layering effect, over the years, that has now created a [tax] system that we think is somewhat unworkable,” Wark said.

The IIAC also called for “an independent and comprehensive examination of the federal tax system,” arguing for a “simpler tax system that is easier to administer, is fair and efficient, and reduces the potential for revenue shortfalls as economic circumstances change.”

The CCOC said Canada’s tax system had “become a complicated web of carve-outs and caveats, which is undermining growth by chasing away innovation.”

The federal government has not engaged in a comprehensive formal review of the tax system since the Carter Commission of the 1960s.

“The government of Canada is continually reviewing the tax system to ensure that it is fair, efficient and as simple as possible,” said Department of Finance spokesperson Caroline Feggans in an emailed response to questions regarding the complexity of Canada’s tax regime. Feggans did not directly address the question of whether the government would launch a formal review.

The call for tax reform is not coming only from investment industry associations.

In a July 3 episode of the Hub Dialogues podcast, University of Calgary economist Trevor Tombe said he believed “we’re at that moment now where the tax system, both federally and for many provincial governments as well, could use some dramatic improvement.”

“This isn’t just about lowering taxes — think of it as distinct from that,” Tombe said. “[It’s] really addressing the underlying structure to ensure that [the tax system] doesn’t distort economic activity and that whatever amount of revenue that a government wants to raise, it does so in the most economically efficient way possible to really maximize our potential for innovation and investment.”

At the Scotiabank Financials Summit on Sept. 4, Dave McKay, president and CEO of Royal Bank of Canada, said his biggest fear was that “we’re discouraging risk taking” and suggested Canada’s tax system was the issue.

“We need a tax structure that encourages risk taking by everybody — not just entrepreneurs and start-up companies and tech firms, but everybody needs to take risk, and the tax structure needs to do that,” McKay said.

Oakey said he believed a review of Canada’s tax system would occur in stages, given the complexity of the Income Tax Act. Simpler issues might be handled first, while deeper policy questions would need more time for consideration.

“I think the biggest thing we need is commitment,” Oakey said. “We need whatever government is in power to say, ‘We need to have some level of review, we need to do it, and actually make it a priority.’ Until then, we can talk about it all we want.”

Originally Appeared Here

The IRS is dealing with a couple of big issues involving TikTok. It turns out some IRS employees aren’t complying with the government-wide ban on the Chinese-owned app on federal devices. But there could be a good reason why some in the tax agency skirted the rule.

Earlier this year, the IRS warned taxpayers about scams and inaccurate social media advice. The agency said to be on guard against fake refund claims for several tax credits including the Fuel Tax credit, Sick and Family Leave credit and the Household Employment Tax.

Chief among these scammers were TikTok users. So it might not be surprising that the site has attracted the attention of the IRS and garnered the public eye again as a major TikTok court hearing was held early this week. (More on that below).

Subscribe to Kiplinger’s Personal Finance

Be a smarter, better informed investor.

Save up to 74%

Sign up for Kiplinger’s Free E-Newsletters

Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and more – straight to your e-mail.

Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice – straight to your e-mail.

We’ll cover how and why the tax agency has tried to work around the TikTok on government devices ban, the tax credits behind the scams, and what you can do if you filed an inaccurate return due to scam or fraud. 

We’ll also talk a little about whether TikTok will be banned from mobile app stores in the United States as soon as January 2025. Read on. 

Is TikTok banned in the US?  

Congress enacted a government-wide ban on TikTok on federal devices almost two years ago due to security concerns regarding the social media platform’s Chinese ownership. The ban disallows the app’s use on all federal government devices, with some exceptions. 

Yet a report released late last year by the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA) found that the IRS continued to allow the app on some devices despite not having an exception.

While the TIGTA audit found that the IRS mostly complied with the TikTok government agency ban, the agency: 

• Had 23 unmanaged (personal) devices that still had  access to the app (though corrective action was taken)
• Gave more than 2,800 Criminal Investigation unit devices the ability to access TikTok

The IRS agreed to update its policy regarding unmanaged devices. However, the tax agency disagreed with completely preventing its Criminal Investigation (CI) Unit from accessing the app. 

The justification for this seems to be tied to investigative activities. The IRS CI division investigates federal crimes, including tax-related scams and fraud. The argument is that monitoring TikTok can help root out illegal activity as well as tax scams and misinformation campaigns.

After the federal restriction was passed, 34 states enacted similar bans, potentially inhibiting progress on the scammer investigation. 

For example, the IRS recently formed a group, the ‘Coalition Against Scam and Scheme Threats’ (CASST) to “combat the growth of scams and schemes threatening taxpayers and tax systems.” State tax agency members who helped form the group may similarly face difficulty skirting the TikTok prohibition.

So, what are the details of common TikTok tax scams to look out for? 

While scammers may falsely advertise other tax credits, like clean energy tax credits, or run other scams mentioned in the IRS’ Dirty Dozen campaign, the following are prominent scams used earlier this year.

The Fuel Tax Credit. This credit is designed for off-road business vehicles and farming equipment. Taxpayers needed a business purpose and a qualifying business activity (such as farming or purchasing aviation gasoline) to qualify.

The Sick Leave and Family Leave Credit. Intended for self-employed individuals during the pandemic, this credit was not available for original 2023 returns, but some people still filed. Taxpayers could not use it for income earned as an employee or a non-self-employed individual. 

Household Employment Taxes. Household Employment Taxes allowed a refund based on sick and family medical leave wages. Some taxpayers “invented” fictional household employees for wages they never paid.

Most taxpayers don’t qualify for the above tax breaks; however, scammers on social media websites, including TikTok, overemphasize the significance and availability of the tax credits.

“Scam artists constantly prey on people’s hope and try to use the complexity of the tax system to convince people there are secret ways to get a big refund,” IRS Commissioner, Danny Werfel said in a release. 

How to file an amended tax return

So, what can you do if you fell for one of these scams? The IRS asks taxpayers who improperly claimed these credits to file an amended return. 

You can confirm whether you need to amend your federal income tax return using an IRS.gov tool. Then you can file a Form 1040-X. to amend your return. 

Note: You must file the original return first before amending it.

However, you may have already received an IRS notification regarding tax credits improperly claimed on your prior return. If that is the case, the letter will generally require a response within 30 days, or you can contact the IRS to request an extension. You may need to first authenticate your identity before amending a return. 

Consult with a tax professional for further guidance.

TikTok court case

How far should the TikTok USA ban go? Who should be exempt? Could TikTok could be banned for all U.S. devices? 

Legislation passed by Congress earlier this year provides that, unless TikTok’s owner divests from the company, TikTok may be banned from U.S. mobile app stores in January 2025. 

However, the app’s owner, ByteDance has said it doesn’t intend to sell.

Instead, TikTok sued the U.S. government. In the case, TikTok vs. Garland, the company is arguing, in part, that without a proven national security threat, the law forcing TikTok to sell violates the First Amendment right to free speech. 

During opening arguments in a September 16 court hearing, Andrew Pincus, an attorney representing TikTok creators argued, “For the first time in history, Congress has expressly targeted a specific U.S. speaker, banning its speech and the speech of 170 million Americans.”

The hearing before a three-judge panel was held in the Federal Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. If the case isn’t resolved there, it could eventually end up in the U.S. Supreme Court. 

Once more, the government has yet to define the scope of TikTok’s national security threat. Those documents are sealed and even ByteDance reportedly doesn’t know their contents.

But as the TIGTA report suggests, enforcing a ban on downloading or updating a social media app, a move that could impact hundreds of millions of U.S. users, is easier said than done. 

Related Content

Originally Appeared Here

EDWARD M PIO RODA / EPA-EFE / Shutterstock.com

On the face of it, a proposal to get rid of income taxes sounds like the kind of political promise designed to win massive support from the voting public. Ex-President Donald Trump floated that idea in a recent meeting with Republican lawmakers, suggesting that federal income taxes could be eliminated altogether and replaced with an “all-tariff” policy designed to fund the government with high tariffs on imported goods.

Check Out: I’m an Economist: Here’s My Prediction for Social Security If Trump Wins the 2024 Election

Read Next: 9 Easy Ways To Build Wealth That Will Last Through Retirement

The idea got a lot of media attention, but so far there hasn’t been much in the way of concrete policies from the Trump campaign team. The proposal’s feasibility is open for debate because of its potential impact on the economy and federal deficit — not to mention its likelihood of ever being approved by Congress. But it would likely be embraced with open arms by millions of cash-strapped taxpayers.

Trump also has suggested eliminating federal income taxes on Social Security benefits – an idea that at least has bipartisan support. In January 2024, U.S. Rep. Angie Craig, a Minnesota Democrat, introduced the “You Earned It, You Keep It Act,” which would eliminate all federal taxes on Social Security benefits beginning in 2025.

But there are problems with eliminating federal taxes on Social Security benefits, or getting rid of them on any type of income. While many Americans– including retirees — might see a short-term boost to their finances, the longer-term consequences could be dire.

Here are four reasons retirees and others might not want Trump to eliminate income taxes.

Earning passive income doesn’t need to be difficult. You can start this week.

Social Security Could Be Threatened

Eliminating taxes on Social Security benefits — or doing away with them altogether – would put an already stressed program under even greater stress. Social Security’s Old Age and Survivors (OASI) Trust Fund is due to run out of money within the next decade, leaving the program solely dependent on payroll taxes for funding. Payroll taxes currently fund about 77% of benefits, but the Social Security Administration also gets funds from income taxes.

Learn More: 8 States To Move to If You Don’t Want To Pay Taxes on Social Security

Exempting Social Security benefits from income tax would increase the U.S. budget deficit by about $1.6 trillion over 10 years, according to a blog from the Tax Foundation. It also would accelerate the insolvency of the Social Security and Medicare trust funds.

Story continues

The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget estimated that the move would push the insolvency date of Social Security’s retirement trust fund up by more than a year. When the fund becomes insolvent, some lawmakers have suggested cutting retirement benefits to deal with the shortfall.

Trump’s income tax idea might be one reason most Americans (and seniors) favor Vice President Kamala Harris over Trump when it comes to managing Social Security, according to a GOBankingRates survey of more than 1,000 U.S. adults. Here are some highlights:

Not Everyone Would Benefit Equally

Chris Orestis, founder of Retirement Genius and an expert in retirement planning and financial health, told GOBankingRates in a recent interview that not everyone would benefit from Trump’s proposal to eliminate taxes on Social Security benefits.

“This would benefit only higher-income seniors, cost workers and the middle class higher taxes, and have no impact on lower-income seniors that need the relief the most,” Orestis said. “In the short term, this tax break penalizes workers not yet on the programs and does nothing for lower-income beneficiaries. In the long run, it hurts future beneficiaries of all stripes, but particularly lower income, as both Social Security and Medicare are undermined.”

More Americans Could Become Uninsured

If Trump were to eliminate income taxes, he would not only have to come up with alternative ways to fund the government — he’d also need to cut government spending to help make up the shortfall. One target for cuts could be the Affordable Care Act (ACA), aka Obamacare.

According to a recent analysis conducted by Capital & Main and Thomas Data Consulting, during the first three years of Donald Trump’s presidency the U.S. saw an increase of 2.3 million uninsured people. The primary reason was Trump’s “repeated undermining” of the ACA, which “made it harder for Americans to get health insurance,” according to Jeremy Lindenfeld, who wrote the Capital & Main report.

“Trump cut the enrollment period in half, canceled outreach programs, slashed the ACA’s $100 million advertising budget by 90%, and removed the penalty for not having insurance,” Lindenfeld said in comments shared with GOBankingRates.

Trump has since softened his stance on the ACA, saying his plan now is to make it “much better, stronger and far less expensive.”

An All-Tariff Policy Could Hurt the U.S. Economy

Trump’s idea to replace income taxes with an all-tariff policy has gotten considerable pushback from economists and financial analysts because of its potential impact on everything from trade and inflation to economic growth.

Analysts at Goldman Sachs said in a recent note that such a policy would shrink the economy, CNN reported. Another fear is that consumer prices will skyrocket again because Americans will have less access to cheaper imported goods.

“It’s one of those magical economic proposals that can actually cause inflation and put you into a recession – at the same time,” David Kelly, chief global strategist at JPMorgan Asset Management, told CNN, adding that tariffs are a “perfect stagflation machine.”

Editor’s note on election coverage: GOBankingRates is nonpartisan and strives to cover all aspects of the economy objectively and present balanced reports on politically focused finance stories. You can find more coverage of this topic on GOBankingRates.com.

More From GOBankingRates

This article originally appeared on GOBankingRates.com: I’m a Retiree: 4 Reasons I Don’t Want Trump To Eliminate Income Taxes

Originally Appeared Here

The IRS identified another wave of warning signs related to incorrect Employee Retention Tax Credit (ERC) claims.

The latest handful of red flags come from common issues IRS compliance teams have spotted while reviewing and processing claims from the pandemic-era tax credit. (These are in addition to seven indicators the IRS underscored earlier this year.)

The red flag alert comes as the agency doubles down on ERC compliance and claims scrutiny after recently restarting processing,  reopening its Voluntary Disclosure Program, and delivering up to 30,000 letters to capture over $1 billion worth of fraudulent or incorrectly claimed credits.

Subscribe to Kiplinger’s Personal Finance

Be a smarter, better informed investor.

Save up to 74%

Sign up for Kiplinger’s Free E-Newsletters

Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and more – straight to your e-mail.

Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice – straight to your e-mail.

Here’s what you need to know.

Five IRS ERC red flags 

When filed correctly, the ERC is a refundable tax credit designed to help businesses who continued to pay employees during COVID-related business shutdowns. As previously reported by Kiplinger, numerous abusive promoters advertised the ability to claim the ERC to unsuspecting employers which led to countless errors and massive ERC fraud. 

For business owners, the consequences of ERC fraud could lead to fines and penalties, and at worst — to criminal charges or imprisonment.

Here are five new trends that suggest your ERC is incorrect.

1. Claiming family members wages as qualified wages

When it comes to family-owned businesses, the ERC has certain limits for majority owners and their related employees. For one, the ERC guidelines don’t consider wages paid to individuals who own more than 50% (majority owner) of the business as eligible for the credit. 

Additionally, wages paid to family members of the majority owner don’t qualify for the ERC. Some examples of “related individuals” include:

• A child or a descendent of a child
• Your sibling or stepbrother, or stepsister
• Your father, mother, or ancestor, or either
• Stepfather or stepmother

The IRS also counts nieces and nephews, aunts or uncles, and any in-laws as related members that wouldn’t qualify for the ERC. Household members or an individual who lives in your principal household for the tax year wouldn’t be eligible either. Your spouse would also be considered a relative for purposes of this IRS scrutiny. 

2. Claiming wages already used for the Paycheck Protection Program

Generally, you can claim both the ERC and Paycheck Protection Program loan forgiveness, as long as you don’t report the same wage. In other words, if you’ve already reported certain wages for the PPP, they will no longer count as qualifying wages for the ERC. 

3. Lack of evidence to support a government-ordered business shutdown

Some employers have been deemed ineligible for the ERC because they haven’t been able to offer sufficient proof that a government order caused a full or partial shutdown of business operations due to COVID. 

To be eligible, government orders must be official and not a suggestion by a local official. Additionally, the qualifying government orders must be at the local, state, or federal level. Some examples include: 

•  An order was made from the city’s mayor stating that all non-essential businesses must close for a specific period.
• Your state issued an emergency proclamation ordering a shelter-in-place period, many times this excluded essential workers.
• A local official imposed curfews on residents that impacted business operating hours.
• Your local health department issued an order mandating business shutdowns.

That being said, any communications from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) generally aren’t considered government orders and aren’t eligible for the ERC.  

4. Employers claiming wages for employees who provided services

Another recurring error was that some large employers falsely claimed wages for employees who were providing services during these ‘business shutdown’ periods. 

For instance, if your employees worked remotely during the pandemic and your business continued to operate, the IRS would determine that your business or trade wasn’t suspended.

5. Essential businesses that could fully operate during the pandemic and didn’t have a decline in gross receipts

As previously reported by Kiplinger, promotors convinced many essential businesses that they could claim the ERC, when they weren’t eligible. In many cases, these employers didn’t partially or fully suspend business operations because employees continued to work as usual.

That doesn’t mean that essential businesses can’t claim the ERC. In fact, if your business experienced a significant decline in gross receipts during 2020 or the first three quarters of 2021 you can still make a claim. Employers can determine if there was a decline in gross receipts by comparing fiscal year 2020 or 2021 with the corresponding quarter in 2019.

• For 2020, you begin qualifying in the quarter when your gross receipts are less than 50% of those in the same quarter in 2019. You no longer qualify once gross receipts are more than 80%.
• For 2021, the gross receipts must be under 80% compared to the same quarter in 2019.

Improper ERC denials in the mix

As part of its ongoing compliance measures, the IRS delivered several waves of disallowance letters to taxpayers and businesses that showed a high risk of incorrect ERC claims. The agency sent 28,000 letters early last month, which would have prevented up to $5 billion in improper payments. 

However, 10% of tax professionals and businesses who received letters disagreed with the IRS decision, IRS Commissioner Danny Werfel first told Tax Notes (paywall). What’s more, those taxpayers were eligible for the ERC. 

Werfel told Tax Notes that the IRS would be working on lowering the error rate below in future waves of denials. 

If you’ve received a disallowance letter from the IRS and suspect the agency got it wrong, act quickly. Here’s what you can do to appeal your ERC claim:

• Request an administrative review of the decision with the IRS Independent Office of Appeals
• Under IRS administrative rules, you’ll have 30 days to submit your appeal from the date of the notice of claim of disallowance

You can also ask your trusted certified tax professional to send a response to Appeals or see if you are eligible for Appeals Fast Track. Just make sure to collect all relevant documentation that supports your claim.

Keep in mind, this will likely be a lengthy process. According to the Taxpayer Advocate (TAS) once your protest goes to Appeals it can take up to five months or longer to hold an initial Appeals conference on your claim.

What can happen if my ERC is incorrect? 

The IRS is making headway as it ramps up ERC claims processing. In March, the agency released seven signs of incorrect ERC claims including, but not limited to: 

• Too many quarters claimed
• Too many employees and wrong calculations
• Citing supply chain issues

If you suspect your ERC claim could have an error, the IRS recommends you use its ERC Eligibility Checklist tool. It could also be helpful to consult with a qualified and trusted tax advisor to help spot incorrect claims.

Remember, the IRS temporarily reopened its Voluntary Disclosure Program, which offers businesses a 15% discount when repaying credits for certain tax periods. The program will run through Nov. 22 and can be an opportunity to self-report ERC errors at a discounted rate. 

Related Content:

Originally Appeared Here