• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Income Tax Aid

  • Home
  • About/Contact
  • Income Tax News

Income Tax News

The 2020 and 2021 debts are forgiven

July 28, 2024 by

The IRS said about 6.8 million Americans could skip this penalty when filing their tax returns for the previous two years following a recent relief measure. It could be seen as a way of giving back to the people and businesses who might have been financially crippled during the pandemic years.

By itself, the IRS has instituted practice to waive failure-to-pay penalties on assessed taxes of less than $100,000 for these tax years, affecting nearly 5 million taxpayers and offering approximately $1 billion in penalty relief. This action was prompted by COVID-19 when most taxpayers could not receive the expected balance due to reminder notices due to disruptions in normal collection processes.

Automatic relief, documents required, and eligibility: Find out if you qualify for this huge Tax Break

To benefit from this form of automatic penalty relief, taxpayers must meet particular requirements. These are taxpayers who have filed Form 1040, 1041, 1120 series or Form 990-T tax returns for 2020 and 2021, received a balance due notice between February 5, 2022, and December 7, 2023, and have unpaid taxes amounting to less than $100,000. The relief covers individual, business, estate, trust, and tax-exempt taxpayers.

Most importantly, these eligible taxpayers automatically receive this relief without taking any additional action. If they already have made payments on their account or have a paid-in-full balance, they will still be able to be automatically given the failure-to-pay assessed tax penalty of less than $100,000 per year. The IRS then offsets any amount due for any other tax year or issues a refund where no amount is due for the year.

Judgments of varying limitations and other courses of action: Know what steps to take if you don’t qualify

However, this relief measure is comprehensive while it has its degree of constriction. It exempts taxpayers with an assessed tax of $100,000 or more from receiving automatic debt relief. These individuals and businesses are not left without options to help them in their green energy pursuits. They can request penalty abatement based on reasonable cause or a First-Time Abate program.

It is also essential to realize and acknowledge that while the failure-to-pay penalty is being removed, it comes with a condition that interest on the remaining balance is not. Interest will continue to accumulate until such a time that the principal sum of the outstanding balance is repaid. Particularly, for those taxpayers who do not qualify for the automatic relief or have other unique situations regarding the tax credit, the IRS suggests contacting them after March 31, 2024.

Overview of payment method and the penalties that follow non-payment: Here’s how you can set up a Payment Plan

For those with outstanding tax liabilities who cannot pay their taxes in one lump sum, the IRS has provided mechanisms to enable the former to meet their tax responsibilities. These are using the Online Payment Agreement tool to set up a payment plan for the tax debt, an Offer in Compromise through which one can agree to pay less than the amount owed to satisfy the debt or an installment agreement that means one can pay off the amount in installments or even get a temporary suspension of the collection process.

Another message that the IRS wants people to understand is that it is bad to delay their response to the IRS notices because tax bills have a way of getting worse with time, and this is because of accrued fees, penalties, and interest. Further consequences for not paying taxes are the loss of such privileges as federal tax liens and levies on property or bank accounts and the inability to travel internationally with passports for individuals with tax debts over $59,000.

IRS Penalty Relief Measure: What you need to know to take advantage of this opportunity

Indeed, this penalty relief by the IRS is one of the measures undertaken to help citizens who faced some difficulties during the pandemic years. In its capacity to offer millions of Americans a way out, the IRS has already removed or instantaneously excused millions of dollars in failure-to-pay penalties for tax debts from the 2020 and 2021 fiscal years. However, it is necessary to note that these filings did not eliminate the obligation to pay taxes for taxpayers ultimately.

However, interest will continue to accrue to unpaid balances, and those who were issued with enormous tax bills may need to seek other forms of relief. In light of the current recovery from the pandemic, the IRS is back to normal collection activities, and every taxpayer needs to evaluate their tax affairs, use the available methods to pay taxes, and handle unsettled tax matters to avoid other severe measures from the IRS in the future.

Originally Appeared Here

Filed Under: Income Tax News

IRS Warns Taxpayers About False “Self Employment Tax Credit” Claims

July 22, 2024 by

The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has issued a warning to taxpayers about misleading claims regarding a non-existent “Self Employment Tax Credit.” Promoters and social media platforms are spreading false information, encouraging taxpayers to file incorrect claims.

Promoters are marketing the so-called “Self Employment Tax Credit” as a way for self-employed individuals and gig workers to receive significant payments related to the COVID-19 pandemic. This misinformation is similar to the misleading promotion of employee retention credit. Some promoters falsely suggest that people can receive payments up to $32,000, even though this is not accurate.

The IRS clarifies that the credit being misrepresented is actually the Credits for Sick Leave and Family Leave. This credit is limited and technical, and many people do not qualify. The IRS is closely scrutinizing claims filed under this provision. People submitting false claims are doing so at their own risk.

“This is another misleading social media claim that’s fooling well-meaning taxpayers into thinking they’re due a big payday,” said IRS Commissioner Danny Werfel. “People shouldn’t be misled by outlandish claims they see on social media. Before paying someone to file these claims, taxpayers should consult with a trusted tax professional to see if they meet the very limited eligibility scenarios.”

Self-employed individuals can claim Credits for Sick and Family Leave only under specific COVID-19-related conditions in 2020 and 2021. The credit is not available for 2023 tax returns. The IRS has noted that many taxpayers are incorrectly using Form 7202, Credits for Sick Leave and Family Leave for Certain Self-Employed Individuals, to claim a credit based on employee income instead of self-employment income.

To qualify for these credits, self-employed workers must meet specific conditions from 2020 and 2021 that prevented them from working. These include caring for someone under quarantine or isolation. The IRS provides detailed FAQs explaining the requirements for this provision.

The IRS sees similarities between the misleading promotion of the “Self Employment Tax Credit” and the aggressive marketing of the Employee Retention Credit. Both are technical credits misrepresented as easy ways for taxpayers to receive large government payments. In reality, these credits have strict and complex requirements.

The IRS urges taxpayers to consult a trusted tax professional before filing for any questionable tax credit claims circulating on social media. The IRS has previously warned about the misuse of Sick and Family Leave Credits due to various tax scams and inaccurate social media advice. These scams led many taxpayers to file inflated refund claims during the last tax season.

In addition to the Sick and Family Leave Credit, the IRS warns taxpayers to be cautious of scams involving the Fuel Tax Credit and household employment taxes. Many dubious claims have been filed, causing delays in refunds and requiring taxpayers to provide documentation to support their claims.

The IRS continues to urge taxpayers to avoid these scams. Myths about obtaining large refunds through these methods persist, but they are false. Many of these scams, including the fuel tax credit scam and bad social media advice, were highlighted during the IRS’s annual Dirty Dozen series.

“These improper claims have been fueled by social media and people sharing bad advice,” Werfel said. “Scam artists constantly prey on people’s hopes and try to use the complexity of the tax system to convince people there are secret ways to get a big refund. All of these scams illustrate that it’s important to carefully review the tax return for accuracy before filing and rely on the advice of a trusted tax professional, not someone trying to make a quick buck or a questionable source on social media.”

Image: Envato

Originally Appeared Here

Filed Under: Income Tax News

US government transitions Veteran’s Affairs, IRS to Login.gov or ID.me

July 19, 2024 by

The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) says it will implement a more streamlined login process for veterans to access benefit and healthcare services through Login.gov or ID.me accounts.

Pitched in a release as a simplifying measure that is part of the Biden-Harris administration’s “comprehensive efforts to safeguard and protect veteran data and that of their beneficiaries,” the shift to digital is only optional for now. After January 31, 2025, My HealtheVet user ID and passwords will be invalid for signing in to VA websites or apps. After September 30, 2025, DS Logon username and passwords will also become invalid.

Login.gov or ID.me accounts require multi-factor authentication, for which touch or face biometrics are an option. Assistant Secretary for Information and Technology and Chief Information Officer Kurt DelBene says “modern accounts like Login.gov or ID.me enhance the existing security and safety of online interactions, offering a robust defense against unauthorized access and identity theft.” Digitization is “all about putting the veteran first.”

The transition promises to offer increased protection for veterans and enhanced security compliance, in line with President Biden’s Executive Order on improving U.S. cybersecurity, which calls for robust security standards for identity verification and multi-factor authentication.

It also aims to provide a smoother experience that consolidates sign-in options by allowing Login.gov and ID.me accounts to be used across other government websites.

VA estimates the transition will impact roughly 3 million veterans and other beneficiaries who do not yet use Login.gov or ID.me accounts to access VA’s online healthcare services. It says it is committed to working to communicate this change to all veterans, and will provide training and resources needed for staff and Veterans Service Organizations working to execute the transition by assisting veterans in navigating authentication options.

A mass digital transition to biometric ID verification platforms is in progress across the American administrative state. The U.S. Social Security Administration recently announced a switch to Login.gov as its user authentication system. More than 5 million people with my Social Security accounts have already made the change. And the General Services Administration (GSA) is currently running a pilot of selfie biometrics for Login.gov onboarding. Participants in the pilot include TransUnion and AuthenticID, Socure, Jumio, LexisNexis, Incode and red violet.

IRS also moves to digital login for foreign asset reporting

A release from the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) says the agency has enhanced identity authentication processes for financial institutions registering under the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA), which requires U.S. taxpayers holding financial assets outside the country to report assets and financial accounts to the IRS.

As of July 14, login through Login.gov or ID.me is required when signing in to access the FATCA Registration System. The IRS notes that the new authentication requirement complies with National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) digital identity guidelines.

A previous contract between the IRS and ID.me for online tax returns generated controversy based on the use of facial recognition and biometric authentication, prompting a search for alternative identity verification measures. Login.gov is apparently that alternative.

Article Topics

biometrics  |  ID.me  |  identity verification  |  IRS  |  Login.gov  |  selfie biometrics  |  U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs  |  U.S. Government

Latest Biometrics News

 

Jul 18, 2024, 4:13 pm EDT

The UK government has announced a coming identity verification services bill that will support digital ID products and services from…

 

Jul 18, 2024, 3:39 pm EDT

A smartphone app designed to streamline queues for the EU’s upcoming border checks will not be available in time for…

 

Jul 18, 2024, 2:09 pm EDT

A data breach at decentralized digital identity verification provider Fractal ID has exposed the ID documents and facial images of…

 

Jul 18, 2024, 1:57 pm EDT

Physical and digital IDs have reached parity in Azerbaijan, where the government has announced that identity information provided through the…

 

Jul 18, 2024, 1:45 pm EDT

RecFaces is calling for facial recognition technology (FRT) to be used as a key security measure to protect critical infrastructure…

 

Jul 18, 2024, 1:13 pm EDT

Malaysia-based selfie biometrics and digital ID provider Wise AI has raised at least ten million dollars in a series A…

Originally Appeared Here

Filed Under: Income Tax News

IRS crypto enforcement tax compliance could get tougher

July 16, 2024 by

The Internal Revenue Service could be doing a better job of cracking down on tax noncompliance by users of virtual currency or digital assets, according to a new report.

The report, released Monday by the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration, acknowledged the IRS established “Operation Hidden Treasure” to identify taxpayers who omit digital assets, such as cryptocurrency, from their tax returns. However, the operation has been limited to the acquisition of tools and training, instead of pursuing taxpayers. The project’s charter didn’t include any specific enforcement goals, in terms of either criminal investigation or civil examination results, or statements identifying what it tried to achieve.

The anonymity of virtual currency and the fact that crypto trading platforms don’t consistently give reports to the IRS on virtual currency transactions complicates enforcement efforts, TIGTA noted.

Internal Revenue Service IRS headquarters in Washington, D.C.

Stefani Reynolds/Photographer: Stefani Reynolds/B

“The tax enforcement of virtual currency transactions is a challenge for the IRS because it does not have a clear window into taxpayers’ virtual currency investments or transactions because their names generally are not directly attached,” said the report. “Further, the IRS does not consistently get reports from trading platforms on virtual currency transactions.”

The number of taxpayers who use crypto as a payment method is growing. Between April 2020 and July 2023, the number of virtual currencies increased 420%. Because the IRS regards virtual currency as property, whenever a taxpayer uses crypto as a medium of exchange, that potentially creates taxable consequences. 

“Making payments with virtual currency has emboldened taxpayers to move money offshore, purchase illegal goods and services, and carry out other nefarious activities,” said the report. “Users may feel there is the possibility of avoiding tax reporting obligations.”

The IRS’s Criminal Investigation division has taken advantage of analytics tools to address virtual currency noncompliance, the report noted. From fiscal years 2018 to 2023, IRS CI investigated 390 cases involving virtual currency or digital assets, with 224 of those cases recommended for prosecution.

On the civil side, the IRS’s civil examination enforcement efforts that focus on digital assets such as crypto are “mostly indirect and negligible,” according to TIGTA. Form 1040 does include a question about digital assets, but the publicly released version of the report is partially redacted, so it’s unclear how this information from this question is used.

The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act of 2021 requires brokers to file an information return listing any digital assets transactions during the year, so the IRS created a new information form, Form 1099-DA, to report the info needed to calculate gains or losses on such transactions. But while the law is supposed to take effect for transactions after Jan. 1, 2023, the proposed regulations are effective for transactions after Jan. 1, 2025, for gross proceeds reporting and Jan. 1, 2026, for basis reporting. The proposed two-year implementation delay will probably hamper efforts to regulate the crypto industry and result in lost tax revenue.

TIGTA recommended the IRS develop a compliance plan that includes the use of Form 1099-DA data, case identification and case selection of digital asset cases. Other recommendations were mostly redacted.

“The IRS agrees that digital asset compliance enforcement can be improved,” wrote IRS chief tax compliance officer Heather Maloy in response to the report. “IRS compliance efforts are still recovering from years of underfunding. The multi-year funding provided by [the Inflation Reduction Act] enables us to hire more enforcement personnel as well as invest in data analytics and technology solutions to support compliance efforts. We will use enhanced data, analytics and technology tools to select compliance cases based on highest risk of noncompliance.”

Accounting Today recently interviewed Don Fort, former chief of IRS Criminal Investigation and now chief business officer of IVIX, an AI-powered platform designed to help tax authorities fight financial crimes and tax noncompliance, on the sidelines of the NYU Tax Controversy Forum in New York in late June. He explained how IRS CI is using technology to ferret out unreported crypto transactions.

“With crypto right now, no information report,” Fort said. “There’s a little bit, but it’s not the government-mandated 1099, and that won’t take effect until January 2025 if it doesn’t get delayed, which means you won’t see the 1099s until 2026 filings. The prior commissioner and I think this commissioner, and a lot of IRS officials, have talked about that they believe part of the tax gap is attributed to crypto and unreported crypto and capital gains, and buying and selling goods and services in crypto. But how do you find out who these people are? The blockchain is open and publicly available, but it doesn’t tell you the person’s name, so how does the IRS know that the person even lives in the United States? How does a state know that the person resides within the confines of their state? That’s an area where crypto, because it’s very technologically heavy, people do generally leave footprints behind that you can make connections, whether they’re buying NFTs or things like that. A lot of these people, even though they may not want a taxing authority to know who they are, leave footprints behind.”

Social media apps and other sites can help analytical tools make those connections.

“People can leave a footprint that you may be able to triangulate and figure out who somebody is,” Fort added. “There’s not a lot of people out there that are able to generate leads in the crypto space. There’s a lot of people that can trace, but identifying who the people are — short of whistleblowers and John Doe summonses — how do you really find out who these people are? I think that’s one of the more valuable areas that we’re working in now.”

Originally Appeared Here

Filed Under: Income Tax News

Ways To Pay Off $10,000 in IRS Debt in Less Than 5 Years

July 13, 2024 by

Julia Sudnitskaya / Shutterstock.com

Owing money to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) is never a good position to be in. Not only can this take a toll on your mental well-being, but it gets even more detrimental to your personal finances due to ever-growing interests. Unforeseen events sometimes derail plans. if that’s you, you aren’t alone.

In 2022, 18.6 million individual taxpayers collectively owed $316 billion in overdue taxes, according to The Wall Street Journal. To pay that debt, experts recommend setting a plan and acting fast to avoid further aggravating your financial situation.

Explore More: You Can Get These 3 Debts Canceled Forever

Find Out: $10K or More in Debt? See If You Could Become Debt-Free (for Less Than You Owe)

The IRS itself said in a fact sheet that if you can’t pay the full amount you owe, “don’t panic,” adding you should also not be afraid and not delay filing.

“There aren’t many worse situations than owing money to the IRS,” said Scott Lieberman, founder of Touchdown Money. “If you can’t pay your taxes when they’re due, the IRS will work with you to let you pay over time. However, you’ll pay penalties and interest for any uncollected taxes, so this can add up quickly.”

Here are some steps that experts recommend if you want to pay off $10,000 in IRS debt in less than five years:

Wealthy people know the best money secrets. Learn how to copy them.

First, Make Sure you File your Taxes

First, calculate what you owe and your current financial status, said Erika Kullberg, attorney, personal finance expert and founder of Erika.com.

And if you haven’t already, file any back tax returns you might currently owe.

“The IRS requires getting your ducks in a row before it will agree to any payment plan, and you’ll have a touchstone for knowing your total debt,” she added. “The IRS Online Payment Agreement helps you set up a monthly budget-friendly payment plan.”

It’s important to note that there is a penalty if you fail to file returns, “so you should file timely even if you can’t pay your balance in full,” the IRS noted on its website.

Make a Budget

Another important step is to create a budget and prioritize your expenses to allocate more funds toward paying off the debt, according to Michael Collins, CFA, founder and CEO, WinCap Financial.

Kullberg echoed the sentiment, stressing the importance of making regular payments and eliminating non-essential expenses to create more money to put toward your debt. She added that you should figure out a budget for your monthly income that allocates a set amount each month for IRS payments.

“And then work to earn side income as well as sell any old unused items you don’t need anymore to put more money toward your tax debt and cut down repayment time,” Collins said.

Story continues

And as Michael Micheletti, consumer finance expert and chief communications officer at Unlock Technologies, noted, the $10,000 total amounts to about $167 a month over five years.

“Many taxpayers can come up with that through a combination of expense-cutting and additional income,” Micheletti said.

Consider “Offers in Compromise”

Another practical tip: if your circumstances lead you to believe you just don’t have the money to pay in full, research an Offer in Compromise (OIC).

“It allows you to settle your tax debt for less than what you owe,” Kullberg said, adding that to do so, you need to establish that paying the full amount would create an ‘economic hardship’. “If you are eligible, you could see a dramatic reduction in what you will actually have to pay. Use the IRS’s Offer in Compromise Pre-Qualifier tool to see if you meet eligibility criteria.”

The IRS said that it generally approves an OIC “when the amount you offer represents the most we can expect to collect within a reasonable period,” according to its website.

You are eligible to apply under certain circumstances, which include:

  • If you filed all required tax returns and made all required estimated payments

  • Aren’t in an open bankruptcy proceeding

  • Have a valid extension for a current year return

  • Are an employer and made tax deposits for the current and past two quarters before you apply

In 2023, there were 30,163 offers in compromise from taxpayers, and the IRS accepted 12,711 of them — for a total amounting to $214.5 million, according to IRS data.

Trending Now: 9 Strategies Americans Are Using To Minimize the Taxes They Pay on Retirement Savings

Consider Payment Plans

Another helpful thing to keep in mind is that the IRS is often willing to work with people. The IRS can help you set up a short-term or long-term payment plan.

“Short-term plans provide up to 180 days — about six months — to pay the balance; long-term plans provide up to 72 months — six years — to pay the balance,” Micheletti said.

To start, complete an online payment agreement application, he said, adding that you will need to propose a workable monthly payment amount and due date.

“And you’ll still have to pay monthly interest and late-payment penalties,” he said.

Micheletti also noted that you can contact the IRS to discuss your situation at the organization’s free Taxpayer Advocate Service.

Another important point:  avoid turning to credit cards.

“While it’s possible to pay IRS tax debt with a credit card, think twice about that,” Micheletti said, noting that current credit card interest rates average more than 20%. “In contrast, the interest rate for most IRS tax debt for individuals is 8%.”

Take a Personal Loan

Another option to tackle this debt — if you have good credit and can qualify for a personal loan at a relatively low rate — is to look into a personal loan.

Micheletti noted, however, that rates are largely dependent on credit and can run from around 8% to 36%.

“A friend or family member might loan you the money, too,” he said. “If you decide on that, get everything in writing – and have full confidence you can adhere to the terms of the agreement,” he added.

Alternatively, you could also access your home’s equity — if you’re a homeowner and have built up equity in your home, consider tapping that for funds to pay your tax bill, he said.

“A home equity loan or home equity line of credit are both loans, so will require qualification based on credit, and loan-to-value and debt-to-income ratios,” he added.

Temporarily Reduce 401(k) Contributions

According to Peter C. Earle, senior economist at the American Institute for Economic Research, reducing your 401k contributions to pay down your tax bill is one strategy worth considering — temporarily.

“Given that IRS debt accrues daily interest and penalties, redirecting a portion of retirement savings toward paying off the tax debt could result in substantial long-term savings by reducing the mushrooming tendency of tax debt,” Earle said.

More From GOBankingRates

This article originally appeared on GOBankingRates.com: Ways To Pay Off $10,000 in IRS Debt in Less Than 5 Years

Originally Appeared Here

Filed Under: Income Tax News

Jim Justice $826 million surplus income tax, special session | News

July 10, 2024 by

State

AlabamaAlaskaArizonaArkansasCaliforniaColoradoConnecticutDelawareFloridaGeorgiaHawaiiIdahoIllinoisIndianaIowaKansasKentuckyLouisianaMaineMarylandMassachusettsMichiganMinnesotaMississippiMissouriMontanaNebraskaNevadaNew HampshireNew JerseyNew MexicoNew YorkNorth CarolinaNorth DakotaOhioOklahomaOregonPennsylvaniaRhode IslandSouth CarolinaSouth DakotaTennesseeTexasUtahVermontVirginiaWashingtonWashington D.C.West VirginiaWisconsinWyomingPuerto RicoUS Virgin IslandsArmed Forces AmericasArmed Forces PacificArmed Forces EuropeNorthern Mariana IslandsMarshall IslandsAmerican SamoaFederated States of MicronesiaGuamPalauAlberta, CanadaBritish Columbia, CanadaManitoba, CanadaNew Brunswick, CanadaNewfoundland, CanadaNova Scotia, CanadaNorthwest Territories, CanadaNunavut, CanadaOntario, CanadaPrince Edward Island, CanadaQuebec, CanadaSaskatchewan, CanadaYukon Territory, Canada

Zip Code

Country

United States of AmericaUS Virgin IslandsUnited States Minor Outlying IslandsCanadaMexico, United Mexican StatesBahamas, Commonwealth of theCuba, Republic ofDominican RepublicHaiti, Republic ofJamaicaAfghanistanAlbania, People’s Socialist Republic ofAlgeria, People’s Democratic Republic ofAmerican SamoaAndorra, Principality ofAngola, Republic ofAnguillaAntarctica (the territory South of 60 deg S)Antigua and BarbudaArgentina, Argentine RepublicArmeniaArubaAustralia, Commonwealth ofAustria, Republic ofAzerbaijan, Republic ofBahrain, Kingdom ofBangladesh, People’s Republic ofBarbadosBelarusBelgium, Kingdom ofBelizeBenin, People’s Republic ofBermudaBhutan, Kingdom ofBolivia, Republic ofBosnia and HerzegovinaBotswana, Republic ofBouvet Island (Bouvetoya)Brazil, Federative Republic ofBritish Indian Ocean Territory (Chagos Archipelago)British Virgin IslandsBrunei DarussalamBulgaria, People’s Republic ofBurkina FasoBurundi, Republic ofCambodia, Kingdom ofCameroon, United Republic ofCape Verde, Republic ofCayman IslandsCentral African RepublicChad, Republic ofChile, Republic ofChina, People’s Republic ofChristmas IslandCocos (Keeling) IslandsColombia, Republic ofComoros, Union of theCongo, Democratic Republic ofCongo, People’s Republic ofCook IslandsCosta Rica, Republic ofCote D’Ivoire, Ivory Coast, Republic of theCyprus, Republic ofCzech RepublicDenmark, Kingdom ofDjibouti, Republic ofDominica, Commonwealth ofEcuador, Republic ofEgypt, Arab Republic ofEl Salvador, Republic ofEquatorial Guinea, Republic ofEritreaEstoniaEthiopiaFaeroe IslandsFalkland Islands (Malvinas)Fiji, Republic of the Fiji IslandsFinland, Republic ofFrance, French RepublicFrench GuianaFrench PolynesiaFrench Southern TerritoriesGabon, Gabonese RepublicGambia, Republic of theGeorgiaGermanyGhana, Republic ofGibraltarGreece, Hellenic RepublicGreenlandGrenadaGuadaloupeGuamGuatemala, Republic ofGuinea, Revolutionary
People’s Rep’c ofGuinea-Bissau, Republic ofGuyana, Republic ofHeard and McDonald IslandsHoly See (Vatican City State)Honduras, Republic ofHong Kong, Special Administrative Region of ChinaHrvatska (Croatia)Hungary, Hungarian People’s RepublicIceland, Republic ofIndia, Republic ofIndonesia, Republic ofIran, Islamic Republic ofIraq, Republic ofIrelandIsrael, State ofItaly, Italian RepublicJapanJordan, Hashemite Kingdom ofKazakhstan, Republic ofKenya, Republic ofKiribati, Republic ofKorea, Democratic People’s Republic ofKorea, Republic ofKuwait, State ofKyrgyz RepublicLao People’s Democratic RepublicLatviaLebanon, Lebanese RepublicLesotho, Kingdom ofLiberia, Republic ofLibyan Arab JamahiriyaLiechtenstein, Principality ofLithuaniaLuxembourg, Grand Duchy ofMacao, Special Administrative Region of ChinaMacedonia, the former Yugoslav Republic ofMadagascar, Republic ofMalawi, Republic ofMalaysiaMaldives, Republic ofMali, Republic ofMalta, Republic ofMarshall IslandsMartiniqueMauritania, Islamic Republic ofMauritiusMayotteMicronesia, Federated States ofMoldova, Republic ofMonaco, Principality ofMongolia, Mongolian People’s RepublicMontserratMorocco, Kingdom ofMozambique, People’s Republic ofMyanmarNamibiaNauru, Republic ofNepal, Kingdom ofNetherlands AntillesNetherlands, Kingdom of theNew CaledoniaNew ZealandNicaragua, Republic ofNiger, Republic of theNigeria, Federal Republic ofNiue, Republic ofNorfolk IslandNorthern Mariana IslandsNorway, Kingdom ofOman, Sultanate ofPakistan, Islamic Republic ofPalauPalestinian Territory, OccupiedPanama, Republic ofPapua New GuineaParaguay, Republic ofPeru, Republic ofPhilippines, Republic of thePitcairn IslandPoland, Polish People’s RepublicPortugal, Portuguese RepublicPuerto RicoQatar, State ofReunionRomania, Socialist Republic ofRussian FederationRwanda, Rwandese RepublicSamoa, Independent State ofSan Marino, Republic ofSao Tome and Principe, Democratic Republic ofSaudi Arabia, Kingdom ofSenegal, Republic ofSerbia and MontenegroSeychelles, Republic ofSierra Leone, Republic ofSingapore, Republic ofSlovakia (Slovak Republic)SloveniaSolomon IslandsSomalia, Somali RepublicSouth Africa, Republic ofSouth Georgia and the South Sandwich IslandsSpain, Spanish StateSri Lanka, Democratic Socialist Republic ofSt. HelenaSt. Kitts and NevisSt. LuciaSt. Pierre and MiquelonSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudan, Democratic Republic of theSuriname, Republic ofSvalbard & Jan Mayen IslandsSwaziland, Kingdom ofSweden, Kingdom ofSwitzerland, Swiss ConfederationSyrian Arab RepublicTaiwan, Province of ChinaTajikistanTanzania, United Republic ofThailand, Kingdom ofTimor-Leste, Democratic Republic ofTogo, Togolese RepublicTokelau (Tokelau Islands)Tonga, Kingdom ofTrinidad and Tobago, Republic ofTunisia, Republic ofTurkey, Republic ofTurkmenistanTurks and Caicos IslandsTuvaluUganda, Republic ofUkraineUnited Arab EmiratesUnited Kingdom of Great Britain & N. IrelandUruguay, Eastern Republic ofUzbekistanVanuatuVenezuela, Bolivarian Republic ofViet Nam, Socialist Republic ofWallis and Futuna IslandsWestern SaharaYemenZambia, Republic ofZimbabwe

Originally Appeared Here

Filed Under: Income Tax News

IRS apology for Trump’s leaked taxes shows lax internal security

July 7, 2024 by

When an Internal Revenue Service contractor embarrassed the agency by leaking confidential information in 2019, attention focused on Donald Trump, who had broken presidential campaign tradition by not revealing his tax records.

But the potential damage went far beyond the president and a few other wealthy Americans whose IRS files were leaked to the New York Times and ProPublica. The leak fueled stories showing how Trump and other mega-wealthy Americans for years paid little or no income tax.

The theft also revealed the private tax data of more than 80,000 people and businesses. That further exposed long-standing IRS cybersecurity shortcomings, a problem plaguing much of government.

IRS officials, pushed by a lawsuit filed by Citadel CEO Kenneth Griffin, apologized to him and the other taxpayers through a news release last week.

“The Internal Revenue Service sincerely apologizes to Mr. Kenneth Griffin and the thousands of other Americans whose personal information was leaked to the press,” the statement said. “The agency believes that its actions and the resolution of this case will result in a stronger and more trustworthy process for safeguarding the personal information of all taxpayers.”

For Griffin, a billionaire Republican megadonor who took no money in the settlement, the case was about accountability, not damages. The leaked taxes showed that Griffin, far from a tax dodger, was the second-largest tax payer in the country from 2013 to 2018.

His statement said he is “grateful to my team for securing an outcome that will better protect American taxpayers and that will ultimately benefit all Americans.”

The IRS confirmed to The Washington Post that 80,000 people and businesses have been affected by the leak, but did not include that figure in its announcement. Although the IRS informed victims through letters that their information was compromised, the apology was communicated only through the news release.

In May, the agency told affected taxpayers that “we do not know — at least not at this point — the full scope of the specific information that Mr. Littlejohn unlawfully disclosed” and that there was “no indication thus far that any of this information” was illegally shared beyond the two news organizations.

When Charles P. Rettig was IRS commissioner two years ago, he downplayed the notion that the tax data was stolen from the agency. He told the Senate Finance Committee there was no indication “that it was actually stolen from the IRS.” Now, after being pressed to do the right thing, the apology from the IRS “acknowledges that it failed to prevent Mr. Littlejohn’s criminal conduct and unlawful disclosure of Mr. Griffin’s confidential data.”

The apology comes after the January sentencing of Charles E. Littlejohn, a former IRS contractor in the District, to five years in prison for leaking the documents. His testimony in the lawsuit reveals how raggedy IRS cybersecurity was.

In a March videotaped deposition, the former Booz Allen Hamilton government-contracting firm employee said, “I was able to access tax returns at will.” He uploaded the records to a private website, “then, on a separate computer, I could log in and download the data.”

To those affected, it might sound like closing the barn door after the horse escaped, but an agency email to The Post said “this incident was simply unacceptable … and it is completely at odds with the IRS’s values and the agency’s commitment to taxpayers. IRS Commissioner Danny Werfel has taken aggressive action to enhance data security to ensure, to the fullest extent feasible, that nothing like the Littlejohn incident from several years ago can happen again in the future.”

That action includes “10 key areas” of enhanced taxpayers’ protection listed in a May 10 IRS document. They include restricting “the number of people with access to the most sensitive taxpayer data sets,” adding “additional firewalls between key taxpayer information and the rest of the IRS,” reducing “dramatically … users’ ability to connect removable media, such as thumb drives, to IRS computers,” and logging “any printing of personal or sensitive tax information … for IRS cybersecurity use.”

Government Accountability Office (GAO) officials first designated government-wide cybersecurity as a high-risk area in 1997, and IRS information security problems were documented well before the Littlejohn exposures. A 2011 GAO audit said despite some progress, “information security weaknesses … continue to jeopardize the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of financial and sensitive taxpayer information.” Just last week, GAO warned that without “a guidance structure to better protect taxpayer information … it is unclear how IRS will adapt to changing security threats in the future and ensure those threats are mitigated.”

The Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA), which conducted the criminal investigation into Littlejohn, reported last year that 21 percent of IRS contractors were delinquent in their required annual privacy awareness training, increasing the risk that they are not prepared to handle taxpayer information. The inspector general will issue a memorandum this month summarizing previously identified IRS data security systemic issues. A TIGTA statement also said it is reviewing how IRS notified taxpayers of the records theft and “confirming whether IRS has ongoing efforts to continue to identify any additional victims of the disclosure.”

In February, TIGTA reported security shortcomings, including “procedures to systemically remove” access to IRS programs for people who no longer require it “were not always working as intended.” The inspector general also discovered 19 contractors who “retained their access to one or more sensitive systems” after unfavorable reports in their most recent background investigations.

As the lawsuit progressed, Griffin’s team was increasingly “horrified at the lack of security and precautions that the IRS takes with people’s confidential information,” Brooke Cucinella, Citadel’s global head of litigation and regulatory inquiries, said during an interview. But the settlement was just what they wanted because it “goes back to them [IRS officials] taking it seriously and committing publicly to investing and fixing these weaknesses and these vulnerabilities.”

But “it shouldn’t take a high-profile lawsuit to extract an apology from an agency that violated Americans’ privacy — and we are awaiting more information on how the IRS plans to prevent this from ever happening again,” House Ways and Means Chairman Jason T. Smith (R-Mo.) said. “The ease and brazenness at which Charles Littlejohn stole and then disclosed confidential financial information for political gain proves change is needed.”

And while “an apology is always nice,” Cucinella said, “an apology with nothing behind it would have been … empty.”

“This always was about accountability.”

Originally Appeared Here

Filed Under: Income Tax News

Do New York State income taxes hinder the Sabres in signing players?

July 4, 2024 by

BUFFALO, N.Y. (WIVB) — As if the Sabres needed any further challenges in their effort to build a roster capable of ending the longest postseason drought in NHL history.

Could New York State’s tax code be partly to blame?

“If you can get New York state to go tax-free, I’m in,” mused Sabres general manager Kevyn Adams, a Clarence native, when asked about the subject following Buffalo’s free agent spree this week. “I think it would help our roster. And I’ll be up for that, too. I’m good with that.”

Sabres offseason tracker: Free agency, trades, draft picks, development camp

It has become difficult to deny the impact of favorable tax situations around the league in recent years. Four of the past five Stanley Cup champions are based in places with no state income tax, and that benefit continues to draw free agents who know they will take home more money there than elsewhere around North America.

“There is a distinct advantage for those teams that are in states with no tax — always,” said Alan Pogroszewski, who has studied and worked with players on tax matters for more than a decade. “There will always be an advantage.”

After jokingly campaigning for lower taxes, Adams said despite that disadvantage, he doesn’t believe the disparity matters too much in signing the players the Sabres covet.

“You focus on what you can control,” Adams said. “Do those teams in those states that don’t have taxes have advantages? Of course.

“But for me, you try to focus your attention on building an organization the right way, where people recognize that and say: that’s the culture, that’s the place that I want to play. If there’s players that flat out just don’t want to be in cold weather or don’t want to be in a state that has higher taxes, then they are probably not for us anyway.”

It is not necessarily the deciding factor for a player, but it certainly doesn’t hurt. The $69 million contract that former Sabres forward Sam Reinhart got to re-sign with the reigning champion Florida Panthers is worth more there than it would have been had he signed for the same terms in many other markets.

Averaging out Reinhart’s salary to $8.625 million annually, he owes $3.15 million in taxes in Florida. He would pay $1.1 million more in California, $1.5 million more in New York and $1.4 million more in Toronto, according to a calculator provided publicly by Cardinal Point Athlete Advisors.

Over the length of the contract that could save him up to $12 million.

“That’s part of the reality,” said San Jose Sharks general manager Mike Grier, a former Sabres player. “I think it is an advantage for those teams: They can obviously pay guys a little bit less, and guys are happy to go there. So not to their fault or anything, those teams take advantage of the situation as they should.”

And they do. Nashville, Florida, Tampa Bay, Dallas, Vegas and Seattle — the six teams in the 32-team NHL in states with no income tax — combined to spend nearly a quarter of the $1 billion-plus in salaries committed Monday when free agency opened.

Winger Jake Guentzel, who played his first seven-plus seasons with Pittsburgh before being traded to Carolina in March, just signed a seven-year deal worth $63 million with the Lightning. Their winning culture was part of the draw, along with the lack of winter weather, but tax experts will point out that he’s coming out ahead financially, too.

“I guess that’s always a good thing if you can make more money,” Guentzel said. “There’s just the positives about Tampa, and there just seems to be so many of them: living the lifestyle, the atmosphere in the rink is unbelievable and if that’s part of it, too, that’s great. There’s just a lot of things behind the scenes that you’re really excited for.”

Pogroszewski, the founder, president and CEO of AFP Consulting LLC, which specializes in the tax preparation and consulting for pro athletes, said he and his colleagues have debated for years how much of a factor financial matters such as these should play in free agent decisions.

Pogroszewski said the New York Rangers or Islanders would need to offer a contract exceeding $88 million to net the same amount as Reinhart’s $69 million contract with the Panthers.

He points out there are things players can do to even the playing field — retirement compensation arrangements in Canada being one of them and establishing residency in a no- or low-tax state is another. Grier said players and agents are all aware of tax differences by state, acknowledging “that definitely figures into everything.”

Veteran defenseman Chris Tanev’s situation featured a different variable. After finishing last season with the Dallas Stars, moving there and becoming a U.S. resident would have triggered Canada’s departure tax on capital gains, while remaining a resident of Ontario would have mitigated the tax advantage of working in Texas.

“That plays a role into it,” said Tanev, who played his first 14 years in Canada with Vancouver and Calgary and is now heading to Toronto after half a season with Dallas. “And family reasons. Just coming to a good team is obviously a big part of that. I didn’t want to leave Dallas and go to a team that wasn’t trying to win, and that was a huge reason why this happened.”

Some good teams do not have big-time tax benefits, such as the Oilers who went to the Cup final and pushed the Panthers to a Game 7. The Canadian dollar also plays a major role in league finances, with player salaries paid in U.S currency.

The vast majority of the league simply has to deal with paying players while considering state or provincial tax implications.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Originally Appeared Here

Filed Under: Income Tax News

IRS Targets Tax Compliance with New Crypto Rules

June 30, 2024 by

The US Treasury has revealed new regulations requiring crypto custodial brokers to report their users’ transactions to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS).

Starting in 2026, these brokers must report gross proceeds on digital asset sales from 2025. They must also report tax-related information on certain digital assets in 2027 for the previous year.

IRS Unveils Final Draft of Crypto Rules

The new regulations target custodial digital asset trading platform operators, hosted wallet providers, digital asset kiosks, and specific digital asset payment processors (PDAPs). The IRS said these brokers cover the majority of digital asset transactions and capture a large number of taxpayers.

Brokers must disclose movements and gains of customer assets, including stablecoins like USDT and high-value NFTs. They must also report the fair market value of tokenized real-world assets in real estate transactions. This regulation provides crypto investors with a simple 1099 form, similar to that of banks and brokers.

Read more: How to Reduce Your Crypto Tax Liability: A Comprehensive Guide

This move is a significant step forward in crypto taxation to curb tax evasion. IRS Commissioner Danny Werfel emphasized that these regulations are crucial for improving tax compliance among high-income individuals. He furthered that the rules would arm taxpayers with the necessary information to simplify their tax reporting process.

“We need to make sure digital assets are not used to hide taxable income, and these final regulations will improve detection of noncompliance in the high-risk space of digital assets. Our research and experience demonstrate that third-party reporting improves compliance. In addition, these regulations will provide taxpayers with much needed information, which will reduce burden and simplify the process of reporting their digital asset activity,” Werfel stated.

Meanwhile, decentralized exchanges and self-custody wallets are not subject to the new reporting rules. Instead, the IRS said it was still reviewing industry comments and needed more time to study the decentralized networks.

“The final regulations do not include reporting requirements for brokers that do not take possession of the digital assets being sold or exchanged. These brokers are commonly called decentralized or non-custodial brokers. The US Treasury Department and the IRS intend to provide rules for these brokers in a different set of final regulations,” the IRS explained.

Read more: The Ultimate US Crypto Tax Guide for 2024

Industry advocacy groups like The Blockchain Association have welcomed the IRS’s decision to study DeFi further. The group’s Head of Legal, Marisa Tashman Coppell, said the regulator’s move showed that the industry’s collective voice continues to positively impact Washington.

Similarly, Jake Chervinsky, a well-known crypto lawyer, described this move as “an unexpected but huge policy win for DeFi.”

“The proposed rule implementing the infrastructure bill’s tax provisions would have required non-custodial DeFi front-ends to KYC users. Treasury just finalized the rule but only for custodians, leaving DeFi for another day,” he remarked.

Disclaimer

In adherence to the Trust Project guidelines, BeInCrypto is committed to unbiased, transparent reporting. This news article aims to provide accurate, timely information. However, readers are advised to verify facts independently and consult with a professional before making any decisions based on this content. Please note that our Terms and Conditions, Privacy Policy, and Disclaimers have been updated.

Originally Appeared Here

Filed Under: Income Tax News

Revenue task force recommends boosting city property, income taxes

June 27, 2024 by

Salem’s revenue task force is recommending the city cover its costs by raising property taxes and creating a new income tax. The money would fund the library, emergency services and other city operations.

The city-appointed group was  tasked with finding ways to bring money into the city as it faces a multi-million dollar gap between its costs and revenue. Task force members worked while incorporating conflicting community feedback and accompanied by the specter of the failed payroll tax.

The group’s final meeting took over two hours on Wednesday, June 26, and focused on finishing touches to the recommendation to make their priorities clear to councilors and the public. They have been at work for five months.

The task force also recommended raising the fees charged to businesses operating in the city.

The task force will present its recommendations to the Salem City Council July 15. The recommendations don’t include extensive strategies to establish the new revenue or specific numbers.

Bill Smaldone, a task force member who was a councilor from 1999 to 2002, said during the meeting that he’s been hearing all the same arguments about the city needing to restrict spending for the past 20 years rather than raise new revenue, despite the evidence of revenue issues.

He said the task force put together a good package of options.

“For the first time in a really long time, the city councilors that get elected in this city can vote for things – can vote to improve the quality of life in this city by raising the level of services so that we’re not always faced every year, over and over, with what’s going to be cut,” he said.

The task force was not assigned to consider budget reductions, which the city council finalized on Monday for the fiscal year that starts July 1.

The group of 29 community members on the task force included business owners, former city councilors, state employees, community organizers, budget experts and more. Here’s what’s in their eight recommendations.

New property tax

The task force recommended a levy that would add a new property tax to be used for specific city services. The levy, which would take city voter approval, would be in place for five years. 

The task force suggested a levy could be crafted in two ways. One would be a “livability levy” to fund the library, parks, recreation and Center 50+. Another option would be a “public safety levy” to fund police and fire.

Such a levy could bring in up to $55 million a year, according to the recommendation packet prepared by consultant group Moss Adams. That would be from the highest potential tax rate of $6 per $1,000 of assessed value.

Noting that city leadership tends to favor funding police and fire, members of the task force leaned toward the “livability levy,” saying they wanted to make their support for those services clear, but ultimately voted to include both options.

Ahead of the meeting, library advocates said they’d like to see the “livability levy” on the ballot next May. Commenters included Jim Scheppke, former state librarian, and David Levy, who chairs the Salem Public Library Advisory Board but spoke as an individual. 

“I guarantee you library enthusiasts, parks enthusiasts, Center 50+ enthusiasts, we would work so hard to pass that. We would run the best campaign this city has ever seen,” Scheppke said.

Walter Perry and Christine Chute, who bought their Salem home because it was so close to the library, pose with their signs at a rally in support of the service on Sunday, April 7 (Abbey McDonald/ Salem Reporter)

Personal Income Tax

The recommended personal income tax would apply to people who file their income taxes within the city of Salem, not including workers living outside Salem. The committee encouraged the council to put such a new tax before voters.

The recommendation is tied to the task force’s long-term goal that the city adopt a more progressive tax structure by revising current city taxes, such as the operation fee now assessed through utility bills.

The task force narrowed language for the new income tax, eliminating phrasing that it could apply to those who live outside the city. The city’s payroll tax proposal last year drew heated opposition in part because it taxed every worker within the city limits regardless of where they lived.

“I think upon initial blush, the public could actually look at this and say ‘here we go again’ instead of what our intention really is,” said member Raquel Moore-Green, who works for the Oregon Senate Republican office.

The task force indicated it wanted high earners to pay more, and that members don’t want any additional taxes on low-income residents. The task force opted to not include a minimum income it would apply to, saying they wanted more public input before defining who should pay. 

Member Becky Beaman was apprehensive about not including a minimum salary, but ultimately voted for the more generic phrasing.

“It was clear from (the city council’s) approach to the wage tax that they are geared toward a regressive, flat fee,” she said during the meeting. “I don’t want to leave it up to them and expect them to be compassionate about the lower income folks.”

In the recommendation packet, Moss Adams said a new income tax could generate up to $92 million a year for the city.

The recommendation acknowledged  that the tax will likely face significant political opposition.

Other options

Business license fees

The recommended use of business license fees could happen several different ways, including a fixed amount per business or tiers based on size. It would likely be paid by businesses annually. It is estimated to bring up to $4 million a year.

Task force members discussed potential impacts, and business owners on the team made a final effort to have it removed from consideration. They lost that vote 7-15.

Bill Riecke, president of Bark Boys Landscaping Supplies, said he wanted to see more limitations on the business fees, noting that it was the business community that rallied against the payroll tax.

“I don’t know that the city wants to take on the business community again for something that’s not going to net a whole heck of a lot,” he said. 

Beaman said that a major factor will be the amount businesses pay, which will be defined in later city processes. She also noted that some businesses already pay a fee for their licenses to operate in Salem.

“I find it difficult to believe that a food truck can pay for a business license, and other businesses can’t,” Beaman said. 

Franchise fee increase

The city’s existing franchise fee is 5% for utilities using Salem-owned rights-of-way, and a 7% fee for telecommunications and solid waste. The proposed increase would bring in up to $6.8 million.

Increasing the frozen base of Urban Renewal Areas

The task force recommended reforming the city’s process for urban renewal districts to send more money to the city for general expenses, diverting money that otherwise would be spent on economic projects in the districts.

Revenue task force recommends boosting city property, income taxesAn opponent of Salem’s payroll tax tables at Salem Reporter’s Town Hall Meeting on Oct. 11, 2023 at the Elsinore Theatre (Laura Tesler/Special to the Salem Reporter)

Long-term options

The task force also recommended three long-term options,:

-Seek an annual payment in lieu of taxes from the state of Oregon. State land is exempt from paying the property taxes that cover city fire, police and medical services. That means Salem collects less in property taxes than similarly-sized cities which have more privately-owned land. 

-Form a new government organization that would include existing governments to then provide shared services such as homeless needs. An example would be 911 emergency services which answer calls outside city limits.

-Reform existing taxes and fees if the city moves ahead with a new income tax. A new city group should tackle that issue, the task force recommended.

Contact reporter Abbey McDonald: [email protected] or 503-575-1251

A MOMENT MORE, PLEASE– If you found this story useful, consider subscribing to Salem Reporter if you don’t already. Work such as this, done by local professionals, depends on community support from subscribers. Please take a moment and sign up now – easy and secure: SUBSCRIBE.

Abbey McDonald joined the Salem Reporter in 2022. She previously worked as the business reporter at The Astorian, where she covered labor issues, health care and social services. A University of Oregon grad, she has also reported for the Malheur Enterprise, The News-Review and Willamette Week.

Originally Appeared Here

Filed Under: Income Tax News

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 8
  • Page 9
  • Page 10
  • Page 11
  • Page 12
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 27
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

More to See

EXCLUSIVE: IRS Quietly Puts On New Face, Ousts Anti-Trump Spokeswoman With Drunk Driving Record

EXCLUSIVE: IRS Quietly Puts On New Face, Ousts Anti-Trump Spokeswoman With Drunk Driving Record

The IRS replaced its left-leaning top spokeswoman who worked at the agency for 27 years but did not announce or explain her removal. Jodie Reynolds, … [Read More...] about EXCLUSIVE: IRS Quietly Puts On New Face, Ousts Anti-Trump Spokeswoman With Drunk Driving Record

Canada: Mark Carney reduces income tax rate to 14% from July, over 22 million Canadians to benefit

Canada: Mark Carney reduces income tax rate to 14% from July, over 22 million Canadians to benefit

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney emphasised that the tax cut will help hard-working Canadians keep more of their paychecks, with savings of up to … [Read More...] about Canada: Mark Carney reduces income tax rate to 14% from July, over 22 million Canadians to benefit

The ERC Claim Period Has Closed — The IRS Must Now Prioritize Resolution, Communication, and Taxpayer Protections

The ERC Claim Period Has Closed — The IRS Must Now Prioritize Resolution, Communication, and Taxpayer Protections

As of April 15, 2025, the window for filing Employee Retention Credit (ERC) claims officially closed, marking the end of a significant chapter in … [Read More...] about The ERC Claim Period Has Closed — The IRS Must Now Prioritize Resolution, Communication, and Taxpayer Protections

Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions | About/ Contact
Copyright © 2025 · Income Tax Aid - Lasiter CPAs

Powered by Electric Oak