• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Income Tax Aid

  • Home
  • About/Contact
  • Income Tax News

Income Tax News

NHL, NHLPA downplay concerns about state income tax

June 4, 2025 by

EDMONTON — The state-tax issue is a non-issue, according to the NHL power brokers currently in the thick of hammering out a new collective bargaining agreement between the league’s owners and players.

“Certainly, it’s an issue that some of our franchises have raised as a concern,” NHL deputy commissioner Bill Daly said Wednesday evening in Edmonton, before the opening of the sixth consecutive Stanley Cup final to feature a team from a no-tax state. “What I’d say at this point is, we don’t share the level of concern that they have. 

“These imbalances have existed forever. Like, there’s nothing new here. There are so many reasons why a player may choose to play in a particular location, for a particular team, for a particular coach that have nothing to do with the tax situation in that market. So, I don’t expect it’s anything we’re going to address proactively as part of this collective bargaining negotiation.” 

That the well-managed Florida Panthers have taken the baton from the well-managed Tampa Bay Lightning and represented the tax-free Sunshine State in three consecutive finals, and that Vegas Golden Knights — hailing from tax-free Nevada — have already been to three finals since their inception in 2017-18 has GMs and fans in heavily taxed provinces and states screaming “No fair!”

NHLPA assistant executive director Ron Hainsey said he is “baffled” that state tax rates have become such a hot-button topic.

  • Watch the Stanley Cup Final on Sportsnet

    With the Stanley Cup within reach, the Edmonton Oilers and Florida Panthers are set to battle once again for hockey’s ultimate prize. Watch every game of the Final on Sportsnet and Sportsnet+.

    Broadcast schedule

“From 2008 until 2020, who ran this league? Pittsburgh, Chicago, Los Angeles, Detroit, for a brief amount of time. Boston. Certainly (Brad) Marchand and (Patrice) Bergeron and (Zdeno) Chara could have made more money somewhere else. They didn’t. They chose to stay,” Hainsey said.

“They were a good team. Made for the finals a bunch of times. Pittsburgh — I’m certain Sid (Crosby) or Geno (Evgeni Malkin) or (Kris) Letang could’ve made more money somewhere else. They stayed there the whole time. 

“Why? Good team. Liked where they lived. Didn’t want to move. Same thing in L.A. What do they all have in common? They all have a different tax situation from Florida, right? That was 12 years. Now we’ve had six years of Tampa, Tampa, Tampa, Florida, Florida, Florida. Just going off the previous 12, I guess we’ve got to wait six more years to see if there even is an issue, right?”

Winning championships isn’t solely based on free agents taking haircuts they can make up in tax breaks. Panthers GM Bill Zito stresses the importance of committed ownership; building a winning, inclusive culture; and addressing needs via trade.

“The tax thing is marginal at best,” Zito said.

To build a state and provincial tax clause into the salary cap would get complicated. Plus, each NHL city has a different cost of living. And what about all those Canadians benefitting from U.S.-dollar paycheques but paying their bills in Canadian currency?

Is the no-state-tax issue being blown of proportion?

“Guys like their paycheques being bigger. I mean, I’m sure that could be a part of it,” said Panthers defenceman Seth Jones. “But that’s just the way it’s happening right now. You know, in 10 years you might see something else happening. I think it’s just a wave. 

“These teams have also drafted well. You look at the players on some of these teams, they’ve drafted them, and they’ve been here their whole careers. So, I don’t know. Maybe it’s looked into too much.”

Hainsey says the topic does come up amongst the PA at times, but certainly thinks it’s overblown.

To cry foul because Florida and Tampa are having their moment here, where good players took less to stick with good teams, is an overreaction, he argues.

“It’s the same thing that’s happened the previous 12 years, right? With all these other teams,” Hainsey said. “Is it really an issue? You know, I’m not certain that it is at this point. I don’t know if we could expect Florida and Tampa to not be great at some point in the cycle.”

CBA talks between commissioner Gary Bettman and NHLPA chief Marty Walsh will continue regularly throughout the Cup Final — well in advance of the 2026 deadline.

“We are having very constructive, professional, cordial dialogue,” Bettman said. “We have more than a year to go and I think we’re in really good shape, having really good discussions.”

Walsh did not place a timeline for when he expects a new CBA to be announced but characterized negotiations as positive and ongoing.

“I feel good with where we are, and we’ll see what happens,” Walsh said. 

“It gets complicated at certain times, any collective bargaining agreement, but it’s not where it was in the past here where you’re seeing national disputes between organized labour and companies.”

• The agreement to send NHL players to the ’26 Olympic Games has not been signed yet, but Walsh assures that it’s simply a matter of “dotting the I’s and crossing the T’s.”

What has been determined, though, is that Russia will not participate, as per the recent announcement made by the IIHF and IOC.

“They’re disappointed — and it’s out of their control,” Walsh says of his Russian contingent. “There’s not much they can do with what’s happening within Ukraine and Russia. And they want to play best-on-best. I mean, we hear it all the time. 

“We were hoping that by this point in time, the conflict of the war would not be where it is. It seems like it’s escalating instead of de-escalating.”

• The NHL won’t hold a formal bid process for when it expands next, but it only seems to be a matter of time before a 33rd and 34th team join the circuit.

“There are some (hopeful owners) we’ve talked to more than others,” Daly said. “But there’s a lot of interest, which I think we’re gratified with.”

Surely, it can’t sit well among players that, under the current CBA, all those juicy expansion team fees go directly into the pockets of the owners and are not lumped in with hockey-related revenue that gets split 50/50.

Walsh bites his lip on the issue: “We’ll cross that bridge when the time happens.”

• Bettman maintains that, despite some rumblings, he is not devising a succession plan for the commissioner’s chair: “Sorry to disappoint.”

• On the likelihood of returning to an in-person draft in 2026, Bettman said: “What we do will be in response to what the clubs tell us they want.”

• Don’t hold your breath for play-in rounds, expanded overtime, penalty jailbreaks or any other major changes to the game. “We don’t think we need to tinker with the rules,” Bettman said.

Originally Appeared Here

Filed Under: Income Tax News

Keselowski compares NASCAR rulebook to IRS tax code | Sports

June 1, 2025 by

State

AlabamaAlaskaArizonaArkansasCaliforniaColoradoConnecticutDelawareFloridaGeorgiaHawaiiIdahoIllinoisIndianaIowaKansasKentuckyLouisianaMaineMarylandMassachusettsMichiganMinnesotaMississippiMissouriMontanaNebraskaNevadaNew HampshireNew JerseyNew MexicoNew YorkNorth CarolinaNorth DakotaOhioOklahomaOregonPennsylvaniaRhode IslandSouth CarolinaSouth DakotaTennesseeTexasUtahVermontVirginiaWashingtonWashington D.C.West VirginiaWisconsinWyomingPuerto RicoUS Virgin IslandsArmed Forces AmericasArmed Forces PacificArmed Forces EuropeNorthern Mariana IslandsMarshall IslandsAmerican SamoaFederated States of MicronesiaGuamPalauAlberta, CanadaBritish Columbia, CanadaManitoba, CanadaNew Brunswick, CanadaNewfoundland, CanadaNova Scotia, CanadaNorthwest Territories, CanadaNunavut, CanadaOntario, CanadaPrince Edward Island, CanadaQuebec, CanadaSaskatchewan, CanadaYukon Territory, Canada

Zip Code

Country

United States of AmericaUS Virgin IslandsUnited States Minor Outlying IslandsCanadaMexico, United Mexican StatesBahamas, Commonwealth of theCuba, Republic ofDominican RepublicHaiti, Republic ofJamaicaAfghanistanAlbania, People’s Socialist Republic ofAlgeria, People’s Democratic Republic ofAmerican SamoaAndorra, Principality ofAngola, Republic ofAnguillaAntarctica (the territory South of 60 deg S)Antigua and BarbudaArgentina, Argentine RepublicArmeniaArubaAustralia, Commonwealth ofAustria, Republic ofAzerbaijan, Republic ofBahrain, Kingdom ofBangladesh, People’s Republic ofBarbadosBelarusBelgium, Kingdom ofBelizeBenin, People’s Republic ofBermudaBhutan, Kingdom ofBolivia, Republic ofBosnia and HerzegovinaBotswana, Republic ofBouvet Island (Bouvetoya)Brazil, Federative Republic ofBritish Indian Ocean Territory (Chagos Archipelago)British Virgin IslandsBrunei DarussalamBulgaria, People’s Republic ofBurkina FasoBurundi, Republic ofCambodia, Kingdom ofCameroon, United Republic ofCape Verde, Republic ofCayman IslandsCentral African RepublicChad, Republic ofChile, Republic ofChina, People’s Republic ofChristmas IslandCocos (Keeling) IslandsColombia, Republic ofComoros, Union of theCongo, Democratic Republic ofCongo, People’s Republic ofCook IslandsCosta Rica, Republic ofCote D’Ivoire, Ivory Coast, Republic of theCyprus, Republic ofCzech RepublicDenmark, Kingdom ofDjibouti, Republic ofDominica, Commonwealth ofEcuador, Republic ofEgypt, Arab Republic ofEl Salvador, Republic ofEquatorial Guinea, Republic ofEritreaEstoniaEthiopiaFaeroe IslandsFalkland Islands (Malvinas)Fiji, Republic of the Fiji IslandsFinland, Republic ofFrance, French RepublicFrench GuianaFrench PolynesiaFrench Southern TerritoriesGabon, Gabonese RepublicGambia, Republic of theGeorgiaGermanyGhana, Republic ofGibraltarGreece, Hellenic RepublicGreenlandGrenadaGuadaloupeGuamGuatemala, Republic ofGuinea, Revolutionary
People’s Rep’c ofGuinea-Bissau, Republic ofGuyana, Republic ofHeard and McDonald IslandsHoly See (Vatican City State)Honduras, Republic ofHong Kong, Special Administrative Region of ChinaHrvatska (Croatia)Hungary, Hungarian People’s RepublicIceland, Republic ofIndia, Republic ofIndonesia, Republic ofIran, Islamic Republic ofIraq, Republic ofIrelandIsrael, State ofItaly, Italian RepublicJapanJordan, Hashemite Kingdom ofKazakhstan, Republic ofKenya, Republic ofKiribati, Republic ofKorea, Democratic People’s Republic ofKorea, Republic ofKuwait, State ofKyrgyz RepublicLao People’s Democratic RepublicLatviaLebanon, Lebanese RepublicLesotho, Kingdom ofLiberia, Republic ofLibyan Arab JamahiriyaLiechtenstein, Principality ofLithuaniaLuxembourg, Grand Duchy ofMacao, Special Administrative Region of ChinaMacedonia, the former Yugoslav Republic ofMadagascar, Republic ofMalawi, Republic ofMalaysiaMaldives, Republic ofMali, Republic ofMalta, Republic ofMarshall IslandsMartiniqueMauritania, Islamic Republic ofMauritiusMayotteMicronesia, Federated States ofMoldova, Republic ofMonaco, Principality ofMongolia, Mongolian People’s RepublicMontserratMorocco, Kingdom ofMozambique, People’s Republic ofMyanmarNamibiaNauru, Republic ofNepal, Kingdom ofNetherlands AntillesNetherlands, Kingdom of theNew CaledoniaNew ZealandNicaragua, Republic ofNiger, Republic of theNigeria, Federal Republic ofNiue, Republic ofNorfolk IslandNorthern Mariana IslandsNorway, Kingdom ofOman, Sultanate ofPakistan, Islamic Republic ofPalauPalestinian Territory, OccupiedPanama, Republic ofPapua New GuineaParaguay, Republic ofPeru, Republic ofPhilippines, Republic of thePitcairn IslandPoland, Polish People’s RepublicPortugal, Portuguese RepublicPuerto RicoQatar, State ofReunionRomania, Socialist Republic ofRussian FederationRwanda, Rwandese RepublicSamoa, Independent State ofSan Marino, Republic ofSao Tome and Principe, Democratic Republic ofSaudi Arabia, Kingdom ofSenegal, Republic ofSerbia and MontenegroSeychelles, Republic ofSierra Leone, Republic ofSingapore, Republic ofSlovakia (Slovak Republic)SloveniaSolomon IslandsSomalia, Somali RepublicSouth Africa, Republic ofSouth Georgia and the South Sandwich IslandsSpain, Spanish StateSri Lanka, Democratic Socialist Republic ofSt. HelenaSt. Kitts and NevisSt. LuciaSt. Pierre and MiquelonSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudan, Democratic Republic of theSuriname, Republic ofSvalbard & Jan Mayen IslandsSwaziland, Kingdom ofSweden, Kingdom ofSwitzerland, Swiss ConfederationSyrian Arab RepublicTaiwan, Province of ChinaTajikistanTanzania, United Republic ofThailand, Kingdom ofTimor-Leste, Democratic Republic ofTogo, Togolese RepublicTokelau (Tokelau Islands)Tonga, Kingdom ofTrinidad and Tobago, Republic ofTunisia, Republic ofTurkey, Republic ofTurkmenistanTurks and Caicos IslandsTuvaluUganda, Republic ofUkraineUnited Arab EmiratesUnited Kingdom of Great Britain & N. IrelandUruguay, Eastern Republic ofUzbekistanVanuatuVenezuela, Bolivarian Republic ofViet Nam, Socialist Republic ofWallis and Futuna IslandsWestern SaharaYemenZambia, Republic ofZimbabwe

Originally Appeared Here

Filed Under: Income Tax News

Nation needs revenue, not a hobbled IRS, to fix finances (Letters to The Republican)

May 29, 2025 by

When a businessperson looks at their financial status and realizes that there is more money going out than coming in, what do they do? They take a two-pronged approach.

One, they look for ways to cut costs. Two, they develop plans to generate more revenue.

Most recognize that our federal government finances are out of whack. We have been spending more money than we are taking in. We hear a bold chorus that we need to cut costs.

Yet on the second necessary step of finding revenue, our elected representatives are silent. There is no call to generate more revenue.

Why? Because generating more revenue means increased taxes. It’s a difficult message that no one wants to hear. Beyond that, the IRS has been chronically underfunded. Our political leaders have consistently underfunded the government arm that makes certain that everyone is paying their fair share.

Imagine your house catches fire. Your trusty fire department is on the scene in minutes. When the firefighters arrive, they put all their effort into pulling your furniture and personal effects out of your house. But they don’t throw water to tamp down the fire.

The fire, like our national debt, will grow and grow. It is all-consuming. Washington’s plan to severely cut costs and at the same time renew a $4.6 trillion tax cut is like the business owner deciding to scour their enterprise in search of cuts and savings, then turning around and giving themselves a big fat raise.

It is foolhardy, self-defeating and irresponsible. Our representatives will claim that these tax cuts will pay for themselves by juicing the economy.

They never do. These tax cuts will increase the deficit, as tax cuts have been doing for the last 45 years. That’s how we got into this mess. There is no free lunch, folks.

CHARLIE CONTANT, Springfield

‘Vets for Trump’ signs puzzle me

While driving around on Memorial Day, I noted several lawn signs reading “Veterans for Trump.” This implied to me that these homeowners support Donald Trump and his policies, not just as an individual, but in their special status as veterans.

Having emigrated from Germany in 1938, my father and uncle both served this country in World War II as members of the Ritchie Boys (Google that if you’ve never heard of it – it’s worth the read).

Although not a veteran myself, I have the utmost respect and appreciation for all that veterans have done to protect our country. Thus, I feel compelled to ask why it is that the people who post these lawn signs feel Donald Trump is worthy of your support.

It couldn’t be his use of “bone spurs” to avoid military service. They seem not to have impacted the many thousands of rounds of golf that he has played.

I can’t imagine it is the denigration of the late Sen. John McCain’s military service (one of our true American heroes), criticizing him for having been captured.

It’s certainly not his labeling of those who lost their lives defending this country as “suckers” and “losers.”

Could it be his appointment of a man totally unqualified for the position of Secretary of Defense, a man who has already compromised classified information on multiple occasions? I doubt it.

How about the reduction of funding for research on veterans’ health issues, particularly depression, substance abuse and suicide?

It’s unlikely support stems from the president’s decimation of the federal workforce, 30% of whom are veterans.

I refuse to believe that it’s his incitement of a deadly attack on the U.S. Capitol in order to overturn the results of a fair election (as confirmed by 60 court decisions).

That brings us to his Memorial Day tweet to the nation that referenced the “scum” that ran the country for the past four years, the “warped radical minds” and the “USA hating judges” – but never once made mention of those who have made the ultimate sacrifice in defense of this country.

So the way I see it, Donald Trump likes to wrap himself in the flag that veterans so valiantly defended, but chooses to ignore most of what that flag represents.

Given the signs, many clearly feel otherwise. So I ask these veterans to please educate me and other readers of The Republican as to how they, as veterans, can support a man that I see as totally unworthy of being Commander-in-Chief. I promise to at least consider your argument, even if I disagree with it.

Many thanks for your service.

RON BERGER, East Longmeadow

Originally Appeared Here

Filed Under: Income Tax News

Gov. Kim Reynolds says property taxes, not income taxes, will be focus in 2026 | News

May 26, 2025 by

Gov. Kim Reynolds said Friday that eliminating Iowa’s income tax may not be on the table before she leaves office — but that she plans to focus on reducing property taxes in the 2026 legislative session.

In her public statement following the adjournment of the 2025 legislative session, Reynolds did not bring up income taxes as a goal for 2026. Instead, she highlighted her plans to work on “reducing Iowans’ property tax burden” next year.

kAmsFC:?8 2? :?E6CG:6H @? “k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^HHH]:@H2A3D]@C8^D9@HD^:@H2AC6DD^:@H2AC6DD^6A:D@56^`agbe^8@G6C?@C<:>C6J?@=5DQmx@H2 !C6DDk^2m[” >@56C2E@C z2J w6?56CD@? @7 #25:@ x@H2 2D<65 #6J?@=5D :7 D96 925 232?5@?65 E96 8@2= E@ 6?5 x@H2’D :?4@>6 E2I @C A=2??65 E@ >@G6 @? 4FEE:?8 3@E9 :?4@>6 2?5 AC@A6CEJ E2I6D 😕 a_ae] #6J?@=5D D2:5[ “E92E H@F=5 36 288C6DD:G6]”k^Am

kAm“x H2?E E@ 4C62E6 2 7@F?52E:@? E92E H96? x 5@ =62G6[ E96 ?6IE #6AF3=:42? 8@G6C?@C E92E D:ED 😕 E92E 492:C H:== 36 23=6 E@ 4@?E:?F6 E@ C65F46 E96 :?5:G:5F2= :?4@>6 E2I C2E6[” #6J?@=5D D2:5] “qFE x 5@ ?665 E@ 7@4FD @? AC@A6CEJ E2I6D] %92E 😀 H92E H6 962C 23@FE 2== E96 E:>6]”k^Am

kAm#6J?@=5D k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^:@H242A:E2=5:DA2E49]4@>^a_ad^_c^“^8@G<:>C6J?@=5DH:==?@ED662;@C 7@4FD @? 4FEE:?8 E2I6D[ A2CE:4F=2C=J 7@4FD:?8 @? x@H2’D :?4@>6 E2I6D] x@H2’D :?5:G:5F2= :?4@>6 E2I C2E6 k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^:@H242A:E2=5:DA2E49]4@>^a_ad^_`^_a^:@H2D:?4@>6E2I5C@ADE@D:?8=6bgC2E6:?a_ad^Qm76== E@ 2 7=2E b]gT C2E6k^2m 😕 y2?F2CJ 7@==@H:?8 2 =2H E96 8@G6C?@C D:8?65 😕 a_ac E92E DA65 FA k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^:@H242A:E2=5:DA2E49]4@>^a_aa^_b^_`^C6J?@=5DD:8?D:?4@>62?54@CA@C2E6E2I4FED:?E@=2H^Qma_aa 4FED E@ :?5:G:5F2= 2?5 4@CA@C2E6 :?4@>6 E2I6Dk^2m]k^Am

kAm(9:=6 #6J?@=5D 92D 46=63C2E65 E96D6 C65F4E:@?D[ D96 92D 2=D@ D2:5 😕 AC6G:@FD J62CD E92E D96 H2?E65 E@ 8@ 7FCE96C 2?5 4@>A=6E6=J 6=:>:?2E6 E96 DE2E6’D :?4@>6 E2I] pE 2 k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^HHH]E9682K6EE6]4@>^8@G6C?>6?EA@=:E:4D^:@H28@G<:>C6J?@=5DH2?EDE@23@=:D9DE2E6:?4@>6E2I3Ja_ae^Qmr2E@ x?DE:EFE6 7@CF> 😕 a_abk^2m[ #6J?@=5D D2:5 96C 8@2= H2D E@ “86E E@ K6C@ :?5:G:5F2= :?4@>6 E2I C2E6 3J E96 6?5 @7 E9:D D64@?5 E6C>]”k^Am

kAm%96 8@G6C?@C D2:5 😕 a_ad[ =68:D=2E@CD 925 “2D<65 E@ E2<6 E96 =625” @? AC@A6CEJ E2I6D[ 3FE E92E D96 A=2??65 E@ 36 >@C6 :?G@=G65 😕 E9:D H@C< 2?5 7:?5:?8 2 D@=FE:@? E@ C65F46 AC@A6CEJ E2I 4@DED E9C@F89 5:D4FDD:@?D H:E9 =@42= 8@G6C?>6?ED 2?5 @E96C DE2<69@=56CD @G6C E96 DF>>6C]k^Am

kAm#6AF3=:42? =68:D=2E:G6 =6256CD[ $6?] s2? s2HD@?[ #r@F?4:= q=F77D 2?5 #6A] q@33J z2F7>2??[ #(:=E@?[ E96 (2JD 2?5 |62?D r@>>:EE66 492:CD 😕 E96 $6?2E6 2?5 w@FD6[ 925 k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^:@H242A:E2=5:DA2E49]4@>^a_ad^_b^_e^8@AE2I4@>>:EE66492:CD:?EC@5F46AC@A6CEJE2I=68:D=2E:@?^Qm:?EC@5F465 2 3:==k^2m 😕 a_ad E@ 6=:>:?2E6 x@H2’D “C@==324<” DJDE6> 7@C 42=4F=2E:?8 AC@A6CEJ E2I6D 2?5 :?DE625 >@G6 E@ 2 “C6G6?F6C6DEC:4E65” DJDE6> E92E H@F=5 =:>:E >@DE AC@A6CEJ E2I =6GJ C2E6D E@ aT 8C@HE9 6249 J62C] %96 AC@A@D2=[ H9:49 H6?E k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^:@H242A:E2=5:DA2E49]4@>^a_ad^_d^_f^D6?2E6A2?6=962CD7665324<@?=2E6DEG6CD:@?@7:@H2AC@A6CEJE2I3:==^QmE9C@F89 >F=E:A=6 :E6C2E:@?Dk^2m 3FE 72:=65 E@ 4@>6 E@ 2 7=@@C G@E6[ 2=D@ :?4=F565 @E96C >62DFC6D :?E6?565 E@ =@H6C AC@A6CEJ E2I6D =:<6 2 D9:7E @7 Scae >:==:@? 😕 z`a 7F?5:?8 7C@> AC@A6CEJ E2I6D E@ E96 DE2E6]k^Am

kAm#6J?@=5D D2:5 D96 5:5 ?@E 36=:6G6 E92E D9:7E:?8 7F?5:?8 E@ E96 DE2E6 ?646DD2C:=J H@F=5 36 E96 4@CC64E D@=FE:@?[ 2D “:E’D DE:== E2IA2J6C 5@==2CD” E92E H@F=5 4@>6 7C@> DE2E6 E2I6D :?DE625 @7 =@42= AC@A6CEJ E2I6D E@ 324< E9:D z`a 7F?5:?8] $96 D2:5 96C 7@4FD @? AFEE:?8 E@86E96C 2 A24<286 E@ 4FE AC@A6CEJ E2I6D H@F=5 :?G@=G6 =@@<:?8 2E “9@H H6 56=:G6C D6CG:46D E@ @FC 4:E:K6?D]”k^Am

kAm$96 D2:5 :E’D ?@E 762D:3=6 7@C x@H2 4@>>F?:E:6D E@ 92G6 “=6G6= @7 8@G6C?>6?E E92E H6 92G6 2?5 6IA64E E96 AC@A6CEJ E2I6D E@ 8@ =@H6C]” $96 D2:5 96C 5:D4FDD:@?D H:== :?G@=G6 H2JD x@H2 42? DEC62>=:?6 8@G6C?>6?E E@ 4FE 4@DED[ 3FE H:== 2=D@ =:<6=J :?G@=G6 492?86D E@ 9@H x@H2 =@42= 8@G6C?>6?ED 92G6 @A6C2E65 😕 E96 A2DE c_ J62CD]k^Am

kAm“xE’D 5:DCFAE:G6[ 3FE E92E >62?D A6@A=6 2C6 8@:?8 E@ AC@323=J 36 2 =:EE=6 F?4@>7@CE23=6[ 2?5 H6’== 92G6 E96 4@?G6CD2E:@?[” #6J?@=5D D2:5] “p?5 x’> ?@E 8@:?8 E@ H2:E F?E:= y2?F2CJ E@ 92G6 :E] (6’C6 8@:?8 E@ 92G6 :E 2== DF>>6C 2D H6’C6 H@C<:?8 @? :E]”k^Am

kAm|@DE @7 E96 8@G6C?@C’D AC:@C:E:6D[ H9:49 D96 =2:5 @FE 5FC:?8 96C k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^:@H242A:E2=5:DA2E49]4@>^a_ad^_`^`c^C6J?@=5D42==D7@C7@4FD@?962=E942C649:=542C62?55:D2DE6CC64@G6CJ:?a_ad^Qmr@?5:E:@? @7 E96 $E2E6 255C6DDk^2m 😕 y2?F2CJ[ H6C6 >6E 367@C6 E96 a_ad D6DD:@? 6?565 62C=:6C E9:D >@?E9] |62DFC6D =:<6 k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^:@H242A:E2=5:DA2E49]4@>^a_ad^_c^b_^8@G<:>C6J?@=5DD:8?DDE2E6H:5632?@?46==A9@?6D:?4=2DD^QmC6DEC:4E:?8 46==A9@?6 FD6 😕 4=2DDC@@>Dk^2m[ k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^:@H242A:E2=5:DA2E49]4@>^a_ad^_d^`b^2D:@H2=68:D=2EFC6?62CD25;@FC?>6?E=2H>2<6CD2AAC@G63F586EA@=:4J3:==D^Qm:?4C62D:?8 >65:42= C6D:56?4J D=@EDk^2m 2?5 >2<:?8 492?86D E@ x@H2’D CFC2= 962=E9 42C6 DJDE6> 2?5 324<7:==:?8 D@>6 k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^:@H242A:E2=5:DA2E49]4@>^3C:67D^8@G<:>C6J?@=5DD:8?D?2EFC2=5:D2DE6C2DD:DE2?463:==:?E@=2H^Qm?2EFC2= 5:D2DE6C 2:5k^2m 7@C x@H2 2C62D :>A24E65 3J a_ac 6IEC6>6 H62E96C 2== A2DD65 E9:D D6DD:@?]k^Am

k9bms:D2DE6C 2:5k^9bm

kAm(96? 2D<65 3J >@56C2E@CD 23@FE E96 k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^HHH]?6HD7C@>E96DE2E6D]4@>^2CE:4=6^76>2=6256C@FDE65@?652J27E6CAF3=:4=J@AA@D:?8286?4JD6=:>:?2E:@?QmAC@A@D65 6=:>:?2E:@?k^2m @7 E96 u656C2= t>6C86?4J |2?286>6?E p86?4J Wut|pX[ E96 7656C2= 286?4J E92E A=2J65 2 =2C86 C@=6 😕 x@H2’D k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^:@H242A:E2=5:DA2E49]4@>^3C:67D^76>22AAC@G6DE6>A@C2CJ9@FD:?8AC@8C2>7@C:@H2?D:?2C62D9:E3J7=@@5:?8E@C?25@6D^QmC64@G6CJ 677@CEDk^2m 27E6C E96 a_ac ?2EFC2= 5:D2DE6CD[ #6J?@=5D D2:5 E96C6 DE:== ?665D E@ “36 2 A2CE?6CD9:A” H:E9 E96 7656C2= 8@G6C?>6?E 3FE E92E D96 D66D 2C62D 7@C :>AC@G6>6?E 😕 ut|p’D C6DA@?D6 DJDE6>]k^Am

kAm“x’> E6==:?8 J@F[ :E E2<6D H2J E@@ =@?8[ :E’D H2J E@@ 3FC62F4C2E:4[” #6J?@=5D D2:5] “*@F @H[ H6’G6 8@E A6@A=6 @? E96 8C@F?5 E92E 42? 24E BF:4<=J] (6 H6C6 23=6 E@ DE2?5 FA D@>6 C62==J F?:BF6 AC@8C2>D 3642FD6 E96J 82G6 FD E96 7=6I:3:=:EJ E@ 5@ E92E] %92E’D H92E DE2E6D 5@[ E92E’D H92E H6 4@F=5 5@] $@ x E9:?< :E C62==J :D D@>6E9:?8 H6 ?665 E@ E2<6 2 =@@< 2E]”k^Am

k9bmr9:=5 42C6k^9bm

kAm$@>6 @7 #6J?@=5D’ AC@A@D2=D[ =:<6 >62DFC6D @? k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^:@H242A:E2=5:DA2E49]4@>^a_ad^_a^`h^8@G6C?@CD3:==E24<=:?849:=542C62446DD25G2?46D:?3@E9492>36CD^Qm49:=5 42C6 :?7C2DECF4EFC6k^2m 2?5 k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^:@H242A:E2=5:DA2E49]4@>^a_ad^_a^`f^8@G6C?@CD6?6C8J3:==25G2?46D^Qm6?6C8J AC@8C2>Dk^2m[ 5:5 ?@E >2<6 :E E@ 96C 56D<]k^Am

kAm%96 49:=5 42C6 3:== :?4=F565 2 AC@G:D:@? E@ D9:7E 7F?5:?8 7C@> E96 6I:DE:?8 t2C=J r9:=59@@5 x@H2 WtrxX 2?5 7656C2= r9:=5 r2C6 2?5 s6G6=@A>6?E uF?5 (C2A pC@F?5 r9:=5 r2C6 7F?5D E@ 2 ?6H S`e >:==:@? 8C2?E A:=@E AC@8C2> 7@C AC6D49@@= AC@G:56CD 2?5 49:=5 42C6 46?E6CD] %96 7@4FD H@F=5 36 @? AC@G:5:?8 7F==52J 42C6 7@C 49:=5C6?]k^Am

kAm%9@F89 E96 =68:D=2E:@? 5:5 ?@E A2DD E9:D D6DD:@?[ #6J?@=5D >@G65 7@CH2C5 %F6D52J E@ 6DE23=:D9 2 r@?E:?FF> @7 r2C6 8C2?E H:E9 E96 x@H2 s6A2CE>6?E @7 w62=E9 2?5 wF>2? $6CG:46D C6=62D:?8 2? :?:E:2= #6BF6DE 7@C !C@A@D2= 7@C E96 8C2?E] %96 8@G6C?@C 2=D@ 6IE6?565 E96 49:=5 42C6 2DD:DE2?46 A:=@E AC@8C2>[ 2==@H:?8 49:=5 42C6 H@C<6CD E@ C646:G6 49:=5 42C6 2DD:DE2?46 7@C E96:C @H? 49:=5C6?]k^Am

k9bmr2C3@? A:A6=:?6Dk^9bm

kAm~?6 3:== E92E #6J?@=5D 92D ?@E H6:8965 😕 @? 😀 k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^HHH]=68:D]:@H2]8@G^=68:D=2E:@?^q:==q@@Aj82lh`Qmw@FD6 u:=6 ebhk^2m[ E96 =68:D=2E:@? AC@A@D:?8 >F=E:A=6 492?86D C6=2E65 E@ E96 FD6 @7 6>:?6?E 5@>2:? 😕 42C3@? D6BF6DEC2E:@? A:A6=:?6 AC@;64ED] %96 3:== k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^:@H242A:E2=5:DA2E49]4@>^a_ad^_d^`b^D6?2E6A2DD6D3:==C67@C>:?86>:?6?E5@>2:?7@C42C3@?A:A6=:?6D^QmA2DD65 E96 $6?2E6 7@==@H:?8 962E65 5632E6k^2m 5FC:?8 E96 =2DE H66< @7 D6DD:@?] #6AF3=:42? =6256CD :? E96 w@FD6[ :?4=F5:?8 w@FD6 $A62<6C !2E vC2DD=6J[ 92G6 D2:5 E96J 36=:6G6 #6J?@=5D H:== D:8? E96 3:== :?E@ =2H 56DA:E6 @AA@D:E:@? 7C@> E96 6E92?@= :?5FDECJ 2?5 D@>6 9:89AC@7:=6 #6AF3=:42?D]k^Am

kAmyF?6 `c 😀 E96 5625=:?6 7@C #6J?@=5D E@ D:8? 3:==D 7C@> E96 a_ad D6DD:@? :?E@ =2Hj :7 D96 5@6D ?@E D:8? @C G6E@ 2 3:== 3J E9:D 5625=:?6[ :E 😀 4@?D:56C65 2 “A@4<6E G6E@” 2?5 ?@E 6?24E65] %96 8@G6C?@C D2:5 @? “x@H2 !C6DD” D96 :D >66E:?8 H:E9 DE2<69@=56CD E@ 5:D4FDD E96 =68:D=2E:@?[ 3FE :D DE:== :? E96 AC@46DD @7 C6D62C49:?8 2?5 4@?D:56C:?8 E96 :>A24ED @7 E96 3:== H:E9 96C A@=:4J E62> 2?5 H:E9 25G@42E6D 3@E9 7@C 2?5 282:?DE E96 >62DFC6]k^Am

kAm“p=>@DE 6G6CJ >66E:?8 92D =65 E@ D@>6 255:E:@?2= C6D62C49 @? >J E62>[ x 92G6 =682= 4@F?D6= =@@<:?8 2E :E[” #6J?@=5D D2:5] “$@ :E’D 366? 2 C62==J 8@@5 AC@46DD[ 2?5 H6’C6 8@:?8 E@ 4@?E:?F6 E92E E9C@F89 2E =62DE E96 ?6IE H66<] $@ x H2?E E@ >2<6 DFC6 E92E x 92G6 8:G6? :?5:G:5F2= DE2<69@=56CD E96 @AA@CEF?:EJ E@ H6:89 :?[ D@ E92E x 42?[ 282:?[ >2<6 >2<6 E96 36DE[ :?7@C>65 564:D:@? E92E x 42? 32D65 @? :?7@C>2E:@? x’G6 962C5]”k^Am

Originally Appeared Here

Filed Under: Income Tax News

IRS Issues Tax Deadline Reminder To Millions

May 23, 2025 by

The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has issued a reminder to millions of U.S. taxpayers living and working abroad to file their 2024 federal income tax returns and pay any taxes due by June 16.

The extension applies to U.S. citizens and resident aliens outside the country, including dual citizens, offering them a two-month grace period after the regular April 15 deadline.

Why It Matters

All U.S. taxpayers, regardless of where they live, must report worldwide income to the IRS. That includes wages, interest, dividends and income from foreign sources. Accurate and timely filing is required to avoid interest, penalties, and the risk of missing out on available tax credits such as the foreign earned income exclusion.

File photo: the Internal Revenue Service Headquarters (IRS) building is seen in Washington.
File photo: the Internal Revenue Service Headquarters (IRS) building is seen in Washington.
J. David Ake/AP

What To Know

U.S. citizens or resident aliens whose residence and main place of business or post of duty is outside the U.S. and Puerto Rico, as well as members of the military on duty abroad, qualify for the automatic two-month extension—shifting their filing deadline from April 15 to June 16, 2025.

Taxpayers unable to file by June 16 can request an additional extension to October 15, 2025. This extension is limited to filing—not to payment. Interest will accrue on any unpaid taxes starting from April 15, 2025.

Electronic extension requests can be submitted through IRS systems, and Form 4868 is available for those unable to file online. Businesses should use Form 7004 for extensions, and can get a six-month extension.

The fastest payment options include IRS Online Account, IRS Direct Pay, and the Electronic Federal Tax Payment System (EFTPS).

U.S. taxpayers without a domestic bank account can transfer payments directly to the IRS. Debit and credit cards, as well as digital wallets, are also accepted and may include service fees.

Individuals affected by the ongoing conflict in Israel, or with residences or businesses in Israel, Gaza, or the West Bank, have their federal filing and payment deadline extended to September 30, 2025.

Military personnel on duty in combat zones may also qualify for automatic extensions.

Taxpayers with foreign financial accounts holding more than $10,000 at any point during 2024 must submit Form 114 (FBAR) electronically to the Treasury Department’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network.

The initial deadline was April 15, 2025, with an automatic extension to October 15, 2025, for those who missed the first date.

What People Are Saying

Jay A. Soled, professor and chair of the Department of Accounting and Information Systems at Rutgers Business School, New Jersey, previously told Newsweek: “Even with the tax-filing extension, interest will apply to any 2024 tax payments received after April 15. This means that unpaid tax-year 2024 tax balances will begin accruing interest, currently at the rate of seven percent per year, compounded daily, after April 15, 2025.”

Commenting on why individuals working and living abroad have a two-month filing extension, Soled said it was “undoubtedly a relic of a bygone era when it was difficult for those living overseas to receive third-party information returns.”

He added that “in light of current technological developments, Congress would be wise to eliminate this exception.”

Richard D. Pomp, professor of law at the UConn Law School, Connecticut, previously told Newsweek, while discussing why individuals working and living abroad have a two-month filing extension: “The extension is a very old rule that predates the digital economy. Correspondence in those early days took place by mail and the time it took for mail to go back and forth across the ocean could lead to delays that taxpayers living in the country did not experience. In the digital economy, things are far more efficient and the rule is probably unduly generous.”

He added: “We are currently living through a total state of chaos at the IRS. Whenever possible, taxpayers abroad should file electronically and verify with screen shots and saved files, and copies of all documentation.

What Happens Next

U.S. taxpayers abroad have until June 16, 2025, to file their returns and pay taxes due for 2024, with eligible individuals able to seek additional extensions or payment arrangements if they are unable to meet this deadline.

Taxpayers affected by the Israel-Hamas conflict or stationed in combat zones should review specific guidance and utilize all available IRS resources for support.

Originally Appeared Here

Filed Under: Income Tax News

House votes to cut Oklahoma income tax to 4.5 percent, sets course to…

May 20, 2025 by

Members of the Oklahoma House of Representatives have voted to cut Oklahoma’s top income-tax rate, which applies to most workers, to 4.5 percent and put the tax on a gradual path to complete elimination.

State Rep. Mark Lepak, a Claremore Republican who carried the bill on the House floor, said it will benefit all workers, but most importantly will help grow Oklahoma’s economy by reducing the state penalty on work and investment.

“I think the real benefit of reducing the income tax is the economic activity that it will generate,” Lepak said.

House Bill 2764 would cut Oklahoma’s top income-tax rate to 4.5 percent starting in 2026 and also reduce the number of tax brackets from six to four.

Supporters noted that the elimination of tax brackets that apply to the state’s lowest earners ensures benefits to all citizens with a job.

“It is a tax cut to every Oklahoman that pays taxes,” said House Speaker Kyle Hilbert, R-Bristow. “Every Oklahoman that pays income taxes is getting a tax cut from this bill.”

The bill also mandates future reductions in the top income-tax rate when state tax collections grow by a specific amount, allowing for that process to be repeated again and again until the personal income tax is completely repealed in the future.

To trigger a rate reduction, total state tax collections must increase by an amount that exceeds the prior highest-year spending total by an amount equal to the estimated cost of another quarter-point tax cut multiplied by 1.25 percent.

HB 2764 is expected to reduce Oklahomans’ tax payments by a combined $340.5 million annually.

Lepak noted that, in recent decades, total state tax collections have increased by about 4 percent per year on average, even as lawmakers reduced the state income tax from 7 percent to the current rate of 4.75 percent.

He noted that personal income-tax collections have increased by 18 percent since 2021, even though the rate was reduced by a quarter-point during that time, falling from 5 percent to the current rate of 4.75 percent.

Opponents Prefer Government Spending

Opponents decried the tax-cut bill in apparently contradictory terms, arguing that it was both too small to make a difference for most families and also so large that it would cause major financial problems for state government.

“The reality of this is that while it will have a small amount of savings for those in poverty, it is not sufficient enough to really have an impact on their circumstances,” said state Rep. Michelle McCane, D-Tulsa.

State Rep. Andy Fugate, D-Oklahoma City, dismissed income-tax cuts as something cheered on only by “rich fat-cat donors.”

State Rep. Forrest Bennett, D-Oklahoma City, said the tax break was being advanced for the benefit of “people who make $683,501 and above, the top one percent in Oklahoma.”

Opponents argued lawmakers should instead increase government spending rather than provide tax breaks to working Oklahomans.

“This, again, will cut down on our investment,” said state Rep. Ellen Pogemiller, D-Oklahoma City.

“I think the real benefit of reducing the income tax is the economic activity that it will generate.”
—State Rep. Mark Lepak (R-Claremore)

“Weather events are getting more extreme, and people are getting sicker, and those are things that the state, one way or another, is going to have to pay for,” Bennett said.

Lepak countered that SB 2764 is designed to benefit Oklahomans who face financial struggles today by creating more opportunities for them in the near future.

“Is enlarging the role of government a good growth strategy?” Lepak asked. “I don’t think so. I think creating a better economy is a better growth strategy, which helps lift people out of poverty.”

Several opponents referenced a recent poll by the State Chamber, the Oklahoma Business Roundtable, and the State Chamber Research Foundation, which had certain questions that indicated business owners preferred various types of government spending increases to tax reductions.

“There’s been no substantial evidence that I believe people want a tax cut, that our businesses are asking for this tax cut,” Pogemiller said.

But that same State Chamber poll also showed that 58 percent of business respondents supported using growth revenue to gradually reduce the personal income tax, with another 27 percent supportive of immediate elimination of the tax. Only 13 percent of respondents said there is no need to reduce the state’s personal income tax rate.

Supporters said the Oklahoma government can easily afford the tax reduction and that state workers deserve to keep more of their wages.

Hilbert noted Oklahoma will still have record savings of $3.5 billion in reserve even after accounting for the tax cut in HB 2764.

“When you’re sitting on that level of surplus, that’s good, because as a state you can conservatively manage where you want to go for the future,” Hilbert said. “But at the same time, you reach a point as a state where you have so much surplus you start to ask, ‘Is it time we restore some of that back to the taxpayers to let them keep a little bit more of their hard-earned money?”

Oklahoma’s current 4.75 percent personal income tax rate is among the highest in the region.

Texas has no personal income tax, while Colorado imposes a 4.4 percent rate. Officials in Arkansas have cut their rate to 3.9 percent. The top rate in Missouri fell to 4.7 percent in January. Louisiana has cut its income-tax rate to 3 percent. Officials in Kansas recently voted to cut their income-tax rate to 4 percent.

Among bordering states, only New Mexico is expected to have a higher personal income-tax rate than Oklahoma if SB 2764 does not become law.

And other states across the country also have much lower personal income-tax rates.

Lepak noted that Mississippi currently has a top income-tax rate of 4.4 percent and has adopted a plan to gradually phase out the tax. Kentucky will have a top rate of 3.5 percent in 2026 and is on a path to zero. Iowa has a top rate of 3.8 percent. Nebraska has a top rate of 3.99 percent. Ohio has a top rate of 3.5 percent. West Virginia officials have put their income tax on a path to zero.

Supporters of SB 2764 said Oklahoma cannot afford to bring up the rear in that multi-state competition.

“We’re certainly falling behind other states that are working on tax cuts,” said state Rep. Gabe Woolley, R-Broken Arrow.

While stressing that income-tax cuts fuel state economic growth and job creation, Lepak also urged his colleagues to think of struggling families when they cast their vote.

“When I say ‘economy,’ I’m talking about the opportunity for everybody in this state to better themselves from an employment perspective, from an income perspective—because there are jobs,” Lepak said. “The best way out of poverty is more jobs that pay better. The only way you can get more jobs is to attract businesses to come here or to grow your own in a way that creates those jobs.”

HB 2764 passed the Oklahoma House of Representatives on a 74-19 vote that broke mostly along party lines, with Republicans in support. The bill now proceeds to the Oklahoma Senate.

Originally Appeared Here

Filed Under: Income Tax News

EXCLUSIVE: IRS Quietly Puts On New Face, Ousts Anti-Trump Spokeswoman With Drunk Driving Record

May 17, 2025 by

The IRS replaced its left-leaning top spokeswoman who worked at the agency for 27 years but did not announce or explain her removal.

Jodie Reynolds, formerly the chief of communications for the agency who was often quoted in news stories, was previously arrested for driving while intoxicated, according to court documents obtained by the Daily Caller News Foundation.

The IRS quietly removed Reynolds’ name from an organizational chart after the DCNF reached out on Thursday about her history. The updated chart shows there is a new “acting” chief.

A conservative group that investigated Reynolds’ background said her case showed hypocrisy in the taxation agency tasked with enforcing the law on Americans.

“Jodie Reynolds is a perfect case study of the rot inside the IRS,” American Accountability Foundation (AAF) president Tom Jones told the DCNF. “This is an agency that will hammer working Americans over a paperwork mistake, yet it kept a top official on payroll after she was arrested for drunk driving.”

Reynolds, 50, led an office handling the IRS’ relations with Congress, other government agencies, the news media and other groups, according to the IRS website. She did not respond to multiple requests for comment from the DCNF, and the IRS’ media office did not answer questions about her employment status.

After the DCNF reached out, Reynolds deleted her X and LinkedIn accounts.

Reynolds had posted on LinkedIn in April that she was looking for another job. The IRS told the DCNF on Tuesday that Reynolds still held her chief position — before the DCNF inquired about her criminal record. The agency did not specify when she was removed.

IRS spokesperson Jodie Reynolds in a mug shot at the Henry County Jail in October 2015 in New Castle, Indiana. (Photo courtesy of Henry County)

While working under both Republican and Democratic presidents, Reynolds displayed disapproval of both Trump administrations’ policy moves in her social media postings.

She posted “#familiesbelongtogether” on Twitter in 2018, referencing a social media campaign against so-called family separation that critics say resulted from President Donald Trump’s border policies. She also liked an April LinkedIn post by a lawyer who announced that she had sued to stop Trump from firing her from the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), the DCNF found.

Reynolds was pulled over and arrested by Knightstown, Indiana police in October 2015 for speeding, nearly veering off the road and “failing to signal lane changes,” the local police department’s affidavit says. The arrest occurred while she was employed as a media relations specialist at the IRS, according to her LinkedIn profile.

Reynolds, who was living in Indiana at the time, told police officers that she had consumed five beers that evening, adding “that she has a government job and that she will lose it if she gets into trouble,” according to the affidavit.

Reynolds remained at the IRS under the Obama administration after having worked there since 1998 — and went on to become a branch chief, acting director and finally, in 2023, rose to become the head of its communications office, a highly visible and influential position.

The affidavit said Reynolds acted in an “abusive” manner toward police during the 2015 encounter and refused to take a chemical test to determine her blood-alcohol content. “She was very argumentative and showed mood swings,” an Indiana state trooper wrote.

In Indiana, refusing a breath test upon request of a law enforcement officer is in itself a crime. One officer said Reynolds refused despite him explaining the law to her.

“I read Indiana Implied Consent to Miss Reynolds,” the officer wrote. “Miss Reynolds said that she will not take anymore tests without a lawyer present. I asked Miss Reynolds if she is refusing to take a chemical test and she said ‘yes I am.’”

Police later obtained a warrant to have Reynolds’ blood drawn at a hospital, revealing she was unlawfully drunk while driving.

The document also said that Reynolds had five other traffic violations going back to the 1990s, four of which were for speeding. She failed to pay the fine for one of the offenses and had her license suspended in 1995.

Reynolds pleaded guilty to operating a vehicle while intoxicated and served one year of probation, though a judge found that she could have also been charged with public intoxication, records show. She initially requested a jury trial to fight her charges, but due to her probation, Reynolds walked away from the 2015 incident with no conviction on her record.

Reynolds asked a court to grant her limited driving privileges less than two months after her arrest, and a judge agreed in December, finding that she did not refuse a chemical test “knowing and willfully.”

“Defendant’s employment with the IRS requires that Defendant sometimes travel to Washington D.C.,” Reynolds’ lawyer wrote in one motion.

“Reynolds could’ve killed someone, and instead of firing her, the IRS handed her a promotion,” the AAF’s Jones told the DCNF. “If that doesn’t tell you everything about the culture of that agency, nothing will.” (RELATED: Most Dem-Voting Federal Bureaucrats Say They Would Disobey ‘Legal’ Orders From Trump, Poll Shows)

The IRS began laying off workers by the dozens in February amid scrutiny from the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), Trump’s agency working to shrink government bureaucracy. The IRS reportedly fired almost a third of its tax auditors and about 50 IT executives by March, with DOGE planning to cut its total staff by up to two-thirds.

Reynolds made her left-leaning views public in 2017, by approvingly reposting a video on Twitter by a Black Lives Matter activist. The post declared: “If you’re tired of going to work and making money for other people, then you’re probably tired of capitalism.”

All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

Originally Appeared Here

Filed Under: Income Tax News

Canada: Mark Carney reduces income tax rate to 14% from July, over 22 million Canadians to benefit

May 14, 2025 by

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney emphasised that the tax cut will help hard-working Canadians keep more of their paychecks, with savings of up to USD 840 per year for families.

Toronto:

A day after forming the new cabinet, Canada on Thursday announced a significant personal income tax cut as one of the government’s top legislative priorities for the new parliamentary session. The proposal will see the lowest marginal personal income tax rate reduced from 15 per cent to 14 per cent, effective from July 1, 2025.

The measure from the Canadian government is expected to benefit nearly 22 million Canadians. According to government estimates, two-income households could save up to USD 840 annually by 2026.

Canada’s Department of Finance in a statement said, “Minister of Finance and National Revenue, Francois-Philippe Champagne, today announced one of the first orders of business on the government’s legislative agenda for the new session of Parliament: tax relief for nearly 22 million Canadians, saving two-income families up to USD 840 a year in 2026.”

“Once legislated, the lowest marginal personal income tax rate will be reduced from 15 per cent to 14 per cent, effective July 1, 2025. This tax cut will help hard-working Canadians keep more of their paycheques to spend where it matters most. This measure is expected to deliver over USD 27 billion in tax savings to Canadians over five years, starting in 2025-26,” the release added.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney emphasised that the tax cut will help hard-working Canadians keep more of their paychecks, with savings of up to USD 840 per year for families.

Sharing a post on X, Carney wrote, “Canada’s new cabinet met for the first time this morning. One of our first orders of business: a tax cut for the middle class. Starting July 1, hard-working Canadians will keep more of their paycheques.”

He added, “Last month, Canadians called for change to bring down the cost of living and to put money back in their pockets. My government will be delivering that change–cutting taxes for the middle class and saving families up to USD 840 a year.”

Champagne emphasised the economic benefits of the new middle-class tax cut and said that this move would provide support amid ongoing economic challenges, including trade uncertainties.

“With today’s middle class tax cut, we are setting the stage for economic growth by helping hard-working Canadians keep more of their paycheques to spend on the priorities that matter most to them. Every Canadian should be able to afford necessities, feel secure, and get ahead financially–and this tax cut will help them do just that. As Canadians continue to feel the impact of ongoing challenges, including trade and tariff uncertainties, they should be able to keep more of what they earn to help build a stronger future and a more resilient Canada,” Champagne said.

As per Canada’s Department of Finance, income is reported and tax is calculated annually. To reflect a one-percentage-point cut in the lowest tax rate coming into effect halfway through the year, the full-year tax rate for 2025 will be 14.5 per cent, and the full-year rate for 2026 and future tax years will be 14 per cent.

The Canada Revenue Agency will update its source deduction tables for the July to December 2025 period so that pay administrators can reduce tax withholdings as of July 1. This means that, effective July 1, individuals with employment income and other income subject to source deductions could have tax withheld at 14 per cent. Otherwise, individuals will realise this tax relief when they file their 2025 tax returns in spring 2026.

The bulk of tax relief will go to those with incomes in the two lowest tax brackets (i.e., those with taxable income under USD 114,750 in 2025), including nearly half to those in the first bracket (USD 57,375 and below in 2025).

(With inputs from ANI)

Originally Appeared Here

Filed Under: Income Tax News

The ERC Claim Period Has Closed — The IRS Must Now Prioritize Resolution, Communication, and Taxpayer Protections

May 11, 2025 by

As of April 15, 2025, the window for filing Employee Retention Credit (ERC) claims officially closed, marking the end of a significant chapter in pandemic-era relief. Yet, while the filing period has ended, the program is far from over. What Congress intended as a lifeline for businesses during the pandemic has become a drawn-out and often confusing experience for many taxpayers.

With more than 597,000 unprocessed claims still in inventory and thousands of disallowance notices already issued, the IRS must now turn its full attention to administering this program in a manner that prioritizes fairness, transparency, and taxpayer rights.

A Brief History of a Bumpy Road: Promise, Complexity, and Consequences

Congress designed the ERC to encourage businesses and nonprofits to retain employees during the economic upheaval of COVID-19. While the credit offered critical financial relief to these employers, it was also highly complex, making it challenging for even the most diligent taxpayers and practitioners to navigate. Unfortunately, this complexity combined with aggressive marketing left the IRS with the unenviable task of discerning which taxpayers filed legitimate ERC claims and were truly depending on it to provide economic relief, and those that were taking advantage of the “perfect storm” for their own personal gain (i.e. complexity of the law, the large payouts, and aggressive marketing by bad actors.)

To address this, the IRS implemented a moratorium on processing new ERC claims beginning September 14, 2023. Hitting the pause button on processing ERC claims may have been a reasonable strategy for the IRS at first, but the moratorium kept going and going and going …. leaving legitimate taxpayers in limbo—many for months or even years. Now that the IRS has resumed processing claims (allowing, disallowing, or initiating an audit on the claim), the focus must shift toward fairness, efficiency, and transparent communication.

Where We Stand Now

The IRS’s return to processing all ERC claims is welcome news, but there’s a long way to go. I think it’s important to frame this progress with realistic expectations.

Despite processing thousands of claims over the last few months, as of early April, over 597,000 ERC claims remain in the IRS’s inventory, including nearly 11,000 cases submitted through my office, TAS, that remain unresolved.

These are often taxpayers who are facing financial hardship and who have limited resources to navigate IRS delays. While the IRS has processed about 64 percent of TAS-submitted claims, that still leaves thousands of small businesses and nonprofits waiting for answers—and often, for desperately needed funds.

Although the IRS has made significant progress on the backlog of ERC claims, there is still a long way to go, and it’s unlikely it will resolve all claims quickly. Realistically, it could take at least until the end of calendar year 2025 to complete processing. That’s a long time for taxpayers to remain in limbo. Therefore, the IRS needs to commit as many resources as possible to ensure it continues to process these claims quickly.

It’s time to eliminate the ERC backlog and provide the relief Congress intended.The ERC Claim Period Has Closed — The IRS Must Now Prioritize Resolution, Communication, and Taxpayer Protections

A Growing Problem: Disallowed Claims and Lack of Clarity

Unfortunately, for many businesses, the challenges don’t stop once the IRS processes a claim. To date, the IRS has issued letters for approximately 84,000 returns claiming the ERC, partially or fully disallowing the claims, and in many of these cases it has not clearly informed taxpayers why their claim was disallowed.

When taxpayers contest a disallowance, the process is opaque, and many have reported that movement is slow and challenging, especially the IRS’s review of taxpayer responses to disallowance notices. Adding additional challenges, there’s no way to track the status of their case once the taxpayer submits a protest requesting consideration by the Independent Office of Appeals, and timelines can stretch on indefinitely. Until the IRS reviews the response, the case is not forwarded to Appeals. Worse, if the process takes more than two years from the date of the disallowance notice, the IRS is legally barred from issuing a refund – even if it later agrees the taxpayer is right and entitled to the refund.

This is not just a matter of red tape; it’s a matter of taxpayer rights, such as the rights:

  • To be informed;
  • To challenge the IRS’s position and be heard; and
  • To a fair and just tax system.

Progress – and Room for Improvement

To its credit, the IRS has recently begun issuing guidance for the Letter 105-C and the Letter 106-C on how to respond to ERC claim disallowances and amend returns following an ERC determination. But these efforts came too late after confusion has already ensued.

For the next chapter of the ERC saga, proactive, timely, and transparent communication must be the norm, not the exception. Sitting in limbo is not acceptable.The ERC Claim Period Has Closed — The IRS Must Now Prioritize Resolution, Communication, and Taxpayer Protections

The Path Forward: Advocate for Taxpayer-Centered Reform

The ERC may be closed to new claims, but its story is far from over. The IRS has a tremendous amount of work ahead, and a responsibility to taxpayers who engaged with the program in good faith.

To support those taxpayers, I urge the IRS to adopt the following recommendations:

  1. Finish the job: Commit to processing all ERC claims by the end of calendar year 2025.
  2. Prioritize hardship cases: Process claims from taxpayers experiencing financial hardship first, followed by the remainder in the order received.
  3. Be transparent: Ensure disallowance notices and Letter 86C include clear factual and legal explanations and give taxpayers sufficient time to respond before transferring cases to Appeals for consideration.
  4. Protect taxpayer rights: Track the IRC § 6532 two-year statute of limitations on contested claims and notify taxpayers six months prior to expiration. Also provide clear instructions for executing Form 907 to extend the limitations period, if appropriate.
  5. Offer faster resolution: Allow ERC claimants access to Fast Track Appeals, providing a quicker and less burdensome alternative to litigation.

Final Thoughts

The ERC was born out of crisis and offered real hope to businesses trying to survive. But years later, the program remains a source of confusion and frustration for too many taxpayers. As the IRS moves forward, it must commit to clear communication, timely processing, and a deep respect for the rights of those it serves.

Taxpayers deserve closure – and they deserve to be heard.The ERC Claim Period Has Closed — The IRS Must Now Prioritize Resolution, Communication, and Taxpayer Protections

Resources

Originally Appeared Here

Filed Under: Income Tax News

Trump Floats Creating New Tax Bracket for Wealthiest Americans: Reports

May 8, 2025 by

President Donald Trump this week told House Republicans to raise taxes on the richest Americans as part of their sprawling budget bill, according to The New York Times and The Washington Post, which cited people familiar with Trump’s stance.

Why It Matters

Trump’s reported demand stands in stark contrast to the mainstream Republican position on taxes, which generally favors tax cuts for wealthier Americans—and also marks a reversal on the president’s own position from just weeks ago.

It could also upend the already tenuous negotiations surrounding the GOP’s budget proposal that House Speaker Mike Johnson is working to shepherd through the lower chamber.

In addition to extending the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act that Trump signed into law in 2017, Republicans are also trying to incorporate Trump’s campaign promises in the measure, including eliminating taxes on tips and increased funding for border security.

The proposal, as it stands at the moment, faces unanimous opposition from congressional Democrats.

House Speaker Mike Johnson, left, and President Donald Trump are seen outside the U.S. Capitol after the Friends of Ireland Luncheon on March 12.
House Speaker Mike Johnson, left, and President Donald Trump are seen outside the U.S. Capitol after the Friends of Ireland Luncheon on March 12.
Francis Chung/POLITICO via AP Images

What To Know

The Times reported that Trump wants people who make more than $2.5 million per year to face a 39.6 percent income tax. The highest current income tax rate of 37 percent applies to those who make more than $626,350 per year and married couples who make more than a combined $751,600 per year.

If implemented, Trump’s plan would roll back one of the tax cuts that took effect as a result of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.

Trump instructed Johnson to include the tax hike in the “big, beautiful bill” during a phone call on Wednesday, the Times reported. The president’s move comes weeks after he publicly spoke out against raising taxes on millionaires.

“I think it would be very disruptive because a lot of the millionaires would leave the country,” he told reporters in the Oval Office last month. “In the old days, they left states, they’d go from one state to the other. Now with transportation so quick and so easy, they leave countries.”

What People Are Saying

Podcast host and former White House chief strategist Steve Bannon recently posted on social media site Gettr: “Big story in WaPo that talks about how the great Russ Vought, Scott Bessent, and others including JD Vance are not just open to working on the ability to have an increase in taxes for, if not the upper bracket, then those making a million or more at 40%.

Bannon added: “Something we’ve advocated strongly and worked for many years here because it is the right thing to do. The working class and middle class need additional tax relief, and this is the way to get it.”

Johnson previously weighed in on raising taxes on millionaires, telling Fox News last month: “I’m not a big fan of doing that. We’re the Republican Party, and we’re for tax reduction for everyone—that’s a general principle that we always try to abide by. There’s lots of discussion, lots of ideas on the Hill. People have different thoughts and theories on how we can solve this perfect equation to get all of this done. But I wouldn’t put any money on any of that yet.”

GOP Senator Josh Hawley of Missouri said he wasn’t opposed to hiking taxes on the wealthiest but told the Post that Republicans wouldn’t back the plan: “Zero, probably,” he said when asked how many would support it. “Maybe one or two.”

What Happens Next

House Republicans are continuing their negotiations over the sweeping budget proposal.

According to the nonpartisan group Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, Trump’s agenda items and the GOP’s priorities in the bill are estimated to cost more than $11 trillion over the next ten years, which Republicans are working to offset by cutting spending in other areas.

Democrats have warned that some of those cuts could affect Medicaid, though Trump has publicly pledged not to touch the critical program, which serves more than 70 million Americans.

Update 5/8/25 9:29 p.m. ET: This story has been updated with additional information and context.

Originally Appeared Here

Filed Under: Income Tax News

  • Page 1
  • Page 2
  • Page 3
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 28
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

More to See

Montana ends its legislative session with major income tax relief

Montana ends its legislative session with major income tax relief

Montana Gov. Greg Gianforte ©Image courtesy of Montana governorThe 2025 Legislative Session is officially over in Montana. Lawmakers in the Treasure … [Read More...] about Montana ends its legislative session with major income tax relief

Trump Seeks to Squeeze Drugmakers’ Revenues to Pay for Tax Cuts

Trump Seeks to Squeeze Drugmakers’ Revenues to Pay for Tax Cuts

By Rachel Cohrs ZhangBloomberg News(TNS) President Donald Trump has set his sights on the pharmaceutical industry to shoulder part of the cost of … [Read More...] about Trump Seeks to Squeeze Drugmakers’ Revenues to Pay for Tax Cuts

A Smaller IRS Will Mean Smaller Taxes (For The Rich)

A Smaller IRS Will Mean Smaller Taxes (For The Rich)

IRS to reduce workforceLast season, taxpayers spent 13 hours doing their taxes, according to a report on ABC. How much we get taxed, how we submit our … [Read More...] about A Smaller IRS Will Mean Smaller Taxes (For The Rich)

Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions | About/ Contact
Copyright © 2025 · Income Tax Aid - Lasiter CPAs

Powered by Electric Oak